+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 18 FirstFirst 123412 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 179
 
  1. #11
    Unregistered
    Guest
    **********ALL PUBLIC RECORD***********

    FOR THE MIAMI DADE POLICE DEPARTMENT
    PROFESSIONAL COMPLIANCE BUREAU
    MIAMI , MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA

    CASE NUMBER: I. A. 2013-0180

    INVESTIGATION INTO
    THE COMPLAINT OF
    MIAMI DADE POLICE
    DEPARTMENT
    ___________________________




    SWORN STATEMENT OF KELLY SULLIVAN

    THEREUPON:

    KELLY SULLIVAN

    HAVING FIRST BEEN DULY SWORN, WAS EXAMINED AND TESTIFIED UPON HIS OATH AS FOLLOWS:

    SERGEANT MAHARAJ: I AM SERGEANT AIMEE MAHARAJ OF THE MIAMI-DADE POLICE DEPARTMENT. I AM THE INVESTIGATOR IN CHARGE OF THIS CASE.

    YOU ARE BEING QUESTIONED AS A SUBJECT EMPLOYEE IN AN OFFICIAL INVESTIGATION BEING CONDUCTED BY THE MIAMI DADE POLICE DEPARTMENT.

    A COMPLAINT HAS BEEN MADE AGAINST YOU IN REFERENCE TO THE CASE THAT WE WILL BE SPEAKING ABOUT.

    THIS INTERVIEW IS BEING CONDUCTED AT THE HEADQUARTERS OFFICE, PCB, AT 3:08 PM, ON THURSDAY, JULY 10TH, 2014.

    ALSO PRESENT IN THIS CONVERSATION IS ATTORNEY BRENDAN COYLE AS WELL AS PCB SERGEANT EDWIN CABRERA.

    OUR CONVERSATION IS BEING RECORDED, YOUR AWARE OF THIS?

    THE WITNESS: I AM

    SERGEANT MARHARJ: HAVE YOU HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO READ AND SIGN THE COMPLAINT NOTIFICATION MEMORANDUM?

    THE WITNESS: I HAVE.

    SERGEANT MAHARAJ: HAVE YOU HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO READ AND SIGN THE SUBJECT EMPLOYEE STATEMENT FORM?

    THE WITNESS: I HAVE

    SERGEANT MAHARAJ: AND WERE YOU PROVIDED WITH A COPY OF FLORIDA STATUE 112.532, LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS AND CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS RIGHTS?

    THE WITNESS: YES, I WAS

    EXAMINATION

    SERGEANT MAHARAJ:

    Q FOR THE RECORD, WOULD YOU PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME.

    A KELLY SULLIVAN

    Q BADGE NUMBER

    A 1693

    Q CLASSIFICATION

    A POLICE SERGEANT

    Q CURRENT ASSIGNMENT

    A POLICE SERGEANT

    Q CURRENT ASSIGNMENT

    A NORTHWEST DISTRICT, CRIME SUPPRESSION TEAM

    Q AGE

    A FORTY-FIVE

    Q LENGTH OF SERVICE

    A TWENTY THREE YEARS AND CHANGE

    Q SERGEANT SULLIVAN, BACK IN 2011 WHAT UNITS HAVE YOU BEEN ASSIGNED SINCE

    A IN 2011 I WAS IN PUBLIC CORRUPTION AND WAS THERE UNTIL-- I WAS THERE PRIOR TO AND THEN THERE UNTIL OCTOBER OF 2013

    Q AND THE LOCATIONS, BECAUSE I KNOW IT HAS MOVED, THE BUREAU HAS MOVED

    A SEVERAL TIMES

    Q TO DIFFERENT LOCATIONS
    TO THE BEST OF YOUR RECOLLECTION, FROM 2011 TO OCTOBER OF 2013, WHAT LOCATIONS WERE THE OFFICES AT?

    A TO THE BEST OF MY RECOLLECTION, I BELIEVE WE WERE IN THE LIGHT SPEED BUILDING WHERE COMMUNICATIONS IS AT NOW. i BELIEVE WE WERE THERE IN 2011. AND THEN WE MOVED OVER TO WHERE I THINK THEY ARE CURRENTLY STILL AT, OVER AT 87TH AVENUE AND NORTHWEST 18 STREET.

    Q THE LIGHT SPEED BUILDING IS THE ONE OFF OF APPROXIMATELY 117 AND NORTHWEST 25 STREET?

    A CORRECT

    Q WHAT WAS YOUR CAPACITY, WAS IT PLAINCLOTHES OR UNIFORM?

    A PLAINCLOTHES

    Q WHAT WERE YOUR HOURS, TO THE BEST OF YOUR RECOLLECTION, GOING BACK TO 2011

    A I BELIEVE IT HAS BEEN, FROM THAT TIME FORWARD, IT WAS PRETTY MUCH 8 AM TO 6 PM, GENERALLY.

    Q AND YOU SAY GENERALLY. WAS THERE TIMES WHERE IT VARIED?

    A THAT WOULD BE OUR STANDARD SCHEDULE, BUT DEPENDING ON OVERTIME AVAILABILITY. OBVIOUSLY, WE MAY ADJUST OUR HOURS OR, YOU KNOW, STAY BEYOND AND COME IN EARLIER AND THINGS OF THAT NATURE.

    Q OK, IN 2010 YOU WERE ASSIGNED A BLUE CHEVY, COLORADO PICKUP TRUCK, IS THAT CORRECT?

    A THAT IS WHAT IT SAID I HAD. IF THAT IS WHAT THE RECORD SHOWS, MORE THAN LIKELY YES. I DID HAVE A BLUE CHEVY COLORADO.

    Q AND, DO YOU RECALL IF IT HAD A CONFIDENTIAL TAG?

    A I BELIEVE IT DID

    Q DID IT HAVE A SUN PASS OF TOLL CARD?

    A YES.

    Q AND YOU WERE AT SOME POINT BACK IN 2011, ACCORDING TO OFFICIAL RECORDS 7, 8 AND 9, WHICH ARE THERE, HAD A DODGE, PICKUP TRUCK AS WELL, A DARK GREEN.

    A CORRECT.

    Q AND, DO YOU RECALL IF IT HAD A CONFIDENTIAL TAG AS WELL?

    A I BELIEVE SO

    Q HOW ABOUT A SUN PASS OR TOLL CARD?

    A IT DID.

    Q IN 2012 YOU WERE ASSIGNED A WHITE FORD PICKUP TRUCK, IS THAT CORRECT?

    A YES MA'AM.

    Q AND TO YOUR RECOLLECTION DID IT HAVE A CONFIDENTIAL TAG AS WELL AS A SUN PASS?

    A YES.

    Q
    Q AND IN 2013 YOU WERE ASSIGNED THE KIA, OPTIMA.

    A CORRECT.

    Q ONCE AGAIN, DID IT HAVE A CONFIDENTIAL TAG AND SUN PASS ASSIGNED TO IT?

    A IT DID.

    Q ON OCTOBER 15, 2013, WHEN WE TOWED THE KIA, OPTIMA THAT WAS ASSIGNED TO YOU AT THE TIME, IT HAD FLORIDA TAG 653 WUM ATTACHED TO THE VEHICLE, CORRECT?

    A I THINK SO.

    Q WOULD YOU LIKE TO CHECK ONE OF THE OFFICIAL RECORDS?

    A I LOOKED AT IT AND I THINK THAT IS THE TAG THAT I SAW ON THE PICTURES THAT YOU HAD FOR THE RECORD, SO IT IS PROBABLY CORRECT, YES.

    Q DID YOU ATTACH THAT TAG TO THE KIA OPTIMA?

    A I DID

    Q AND WHEN YOU AUTHORIZED US FOR CONSENT FOR US TO SEARCH THE KIA, OPTIMA, WE LOCATED ADDITIONAL TAGS IN THE TRUNK WHICH WAS GEORGIA AXG3287, A TEXAS TAG OF S76NTS AND A FLORIDA TAG. IS THAT CORRECT?

    A YES.

    Q AND DURING THIS SEARCH WE ALSO LOCATED A SUN PASS WITH A NUMBER OF 1815 WHICH WAS LOCATED INSIDE THE KIA, OPTIMA.
    WAS THAT THE SUN PASS ASSIGNED TO THE KIA?

    A I BELIEVE SO.

    Q HOW DID YOU OBTAIN POSSESSION OF THE GEORGIA TAGS AND FLORIDA TAG THAT WAS ON THE KIA, OPTIMA?

    A I PURCHASED THEM ONLINE.

    Q DO YOU RECALL WHAT TYPE OF WEBSITE IT WAS?

    A I BELIEVE THE WEBSITE IS CALLED PLATESUSA.COM

    Q AND FOR WHAT PURPOSE DID YOU PURCHASE THESE TAGS?

    A FOR CONDUCTING UNDERCOVER INVESTIGATIONS AND SURVEILLANCE'S.

    Q WERE YOU AWARE IF ANY OF THESE TAGS WERE ACTUALLY REGISTERED TO ANYONE?

    a NO MY ASSUMPTION WAS THAT SINCE I WAS BUYING THEM ONLINE, THAT THEY WERE DEAD TAGS THAT WERE OUT OF USE. SO I DONT, I DIDNT BELIEVE THEY WERE ASSIGNED TO ANYBODY. I WOULD REFER TO THEM AS A DEAD TAG.

    Q AND DID YOU EVER RUN THESE TAGS IN ANY TYPE OF SYSTEM TO CONFIRM THAT?

    A I DONT RECALL IF I DID. I DONT THINK THAT I DID.

    Q DO YOU KNOW OR ARE YOU AWARE THAT FLORIDA TAG 653 WUM WAS REPORTED STOLEN BACK IN OCTOBER OF 2013?

    A I HAD NO IDEA.

    Q YOU HAVE PREVIOUSLY MENTIONED YOU DID ATTACH THE ACTUAL FLORIDA TAG 654 WUM ON THE COUNTY, THE ASSIGNED VEHICLE THAT YOU HAD WHICH WAS A KIA, OPTIMA.
    SO DID YOU EVER ATTACH IT ALSO TO THE OTHER VEHICLES THAT WERE ASSIGNED TO YOU, WHICH WAS THE CHEVY, THE DODGE, AND FORD PICKUP TRUCK?

    A PROBABLY. I KNOW I DID ATTACH IT TO THOSE VEHICLE. IT IS JUST THAT I DONT KNOW. BUT YES, I DID.

    Q SO IT IS SAFE TO SAY THAT BACK SINCE 2011 AT SOME POINT YOU DID ATTACH THEM TO THOSE VEHICLES, TO THE VEHICLE THAT YOU WERE ASSIGNED TO.

    A YES MA'AM.

    Q AND HOW ABOUT THE GEORGIA TAG?

    A THE SAME, YES.

    Q AS WELL.
    OK. SO JUST TO RECAP, JUST TO CLARIFY. THE FLORIDA TAG 653 WUM, THE GEORGIA TAG AXG3287 AND TEXAS TAG S76NTS, YOU AT SOME POINT ATTACHED THESE UNAUTHORIZED TAGS TO YOUR COUNTY ASSIGNED VEHICLES SINCE 2011 TO OCTOBER OF 2013?

    A THAT IS CORRECT.

    Q KNOWING THAT YOU WERE NOT UTILIZING THE SUN PASS ATTACHED TO THESE VEHICLES AT THE TIME, WHEN YOU WOULD GO THROUGH THE TOLL PLAZA, HOW DO YOU THINK THAT THE SUN PASS WOULD COLLECT THEIR MONEY?

    End of page 1

  2. #12
    Unregistered
    Guest
    A I DIDNT THINK THAT IT WOULD COME UP BECAUSE i ASSUMED IT WAS TAGS TO BE DEAD. I DIDNT EVEN THINK THAT THERE WOULD BE ANY WAY BACK TO COLLECT ANY MONEY FOR THE SUN PASS. I WASNT TRYING TO AVOID SUN PASS. IT WAS JUST THEY ARE ON THE CAR AND I DIDNT USE A SUN PASS. AND I DID NOT SO TO MAINTAIN THE ANONYMITY OF THE INVESTIGATIONS THAT WE WERE WORKING.

    Q EXPLAIN A LITTLE BIT MORE IN DETAIL WHY YOU DIDNT USE THE COUNTY SUN PASS THAT WAS ASSIGNED TO THE VEHICLES.

    A OUR COUNTY SUN PASSES ARE SUBJECT TO 119 RECORDS REQUESTS, LOST AND BASED ON THE TYPE OF PEOPLE THAT WE INVESTIGATED AND THE RESOURCES THAT THOSE PEOPLE AND THE CORPORATIONS AND WHATNOT HAVE, THEY WOULD HAVE THE SAME IF NOT BETTER RESOURCES THAN WE DO TO DISCOVER RECORDS AND FIGURE OUT LOCATIONS, WHETHER IT WOULD BE THROUGH SUN PASS TAG CHECK AND WHATNOT. SO THAT IS THE REASON WHY I DID NOT USE THE SUN PASS.

    Q DID YOU EVER HAVE THE INTENTION TO ACTUALLY DEFRAUD THE SUN PASS TOLL COMPANY?

    A ABSOLUTELY NOT. Q ARE YOU AWARE OF THE CONSEQUENCES THAT YOUR ACTION CAUSED?
    I WAS INFORMED OF WHAT HAPPENED TO ONE, PARTICULARLY ONE OF THE PEOPLE INVOLVED, YES.

    Q DO YOU KNOW MR. MARLON MORRIS OR RENE ARMENDARIZ OR JUAN LUNA?

    A I DO NOT KNOW THEM.

    Q AS A RESULT OF HAVING UTILIZED THE UNAUTHORIZED FLORIDA TAG 653 WUM, WHICH WAS NOT ASSIGNED TO ANY DEPARTMENTAL ISSUED VEHICLE, YOU INCURRED ONE THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED TWENTY ONE DOLLARS AND SEVEN CENTS OF UNPAID SUN PASS TOLLS, IS THAT CORRECT?

    A YES MA'AM.

    Q AND THE TEXAS TAG S76NTS YOU INCURRED TWO HUNDRED AND SIXTEEN DOLLARS AND NINETEEN CENTS, IS THAT CORRECT?

    A YES MA'AM

    Q AS A RESULT OF UTILIZING THE FLORIDA TAG AND INCURRING SEVERAL SUNPASS TOLLS VIOLATIONS, ARE YOU AWARE THAT YOU CAUSED THE REGISTERED OWNER, WHICH IS MR. MARLON MORRIS DRIVER'S LICENSE TO BECOME SUSPENDED?

    A I WAS MADE AWARE OF THAT, YES.

    Q WHEN DID YOU BECOME AWARE OF THAT?

    A NOT UNTIL AFTER YOU GUYS DELIVERED THE PRIOR-TO-LETTER.

    Q HOWEVER, PRIOR TO THAT YOU HAD NO KNOWLEDGE?

    A I HAD NO CLUE.

    Q TO THE BEST OF YOUR RECOLLECTION, GOING BACK TO TUESDAY, JANUARY 11, 2011, YOU WERE DRIVING THE CHEVY, COLORADO AND COMMITTED A TRAFFIC INFRACTION WHERE YOU WERE UTILIZING THE FLORIDA TAG 654 WUM AT THE INTERSECTION OF NORTHWEST 207 STREET AND 27 AVENUE. WERE YOU AWARE THAT THIS INFRACTION OCCURRED WHICH WAS TO A RED LIGHT TRAFFIC CITATION ON A CAMERA?

    A NO, I WAS NOT.

    Q YOU PREVIOUSLY MENTIONED THAT YOU WOULD USE THESE TAGS AND CHANGE THEM PERIODICALLY BECAUSE OF YOUR SURVEILLANCE DETAILS ON CERTAIN CASES YOU WERE WORKING ON, CORRECT?

    A CORRECT.

    Q CLARIFY. IF YOU HAD A CONFIDENTIAL TAG WHICH DOES NOT COME BACK IF THEY RUN IT IN THE SYSTEM, WHY DID YOU DECIDE TO USE THESE OTHER TAGS AND NOT STAY WITH THE CONFIDENTIAL TAG?

    A BECAUSE OF THE LEVEL OF CRIMINALS THAT WE WERE DEALING WITH AND THE LEVEL OF INVESTIGATIONS THAT WE WERE DEALING WITH, WE WOULD INVESTIGATE PEOPLE WITH NUMEROUS RESOURCES, THE SAME OR BETTER THAN WHAT WE HAD, AND A LOT OF PEOPLE WITH A LOT OF POLITICAL PULL BECAUSE WE WERE WORKING IN PUBLIC CORRUPTION, POLITICIANS, OTHER POLICE DEPARTMENTS, OTHER POLICE OFFICERS, HIGHLY LEVEL COUNTY EMPLOYEES. AND BASED ON THE FACT THAT WE WERE DEALING WITH A SMARTER CALIBER OF CRIMINALS THAN THE NORMAL PERSON, THEY WOULD FIGURE OUT THAT IF THEY RAN A TAG AND IT CAME BACK AS A CONFIDENTIAL TAG OR A NOT ON FILE TAG, THAT THEY WOULD ASSUME THAT IT WAS A POLICE CAR, A POLICE VEHICLE, AND THUS COMPROMISE THE INVESTIGATION.

    Q AT ANY POINT DURING THE TIME THAT YOU UTILIZED THE TAGS, DID YOU UTILIZE THESE TAGS AND RUN THE SUN PASS WHILE GOING TO AND FROM WORK?

    A IT IS VERY POSSIBLE YES.

    Q ON JUNE 13, 2014 1 LITTLE BIT PRIOR TO THAT YOU RECEIVED A PRIOR-TO-LETTER. HOWEVER, ON JUNE 14,--ON JUNE 13, I AM SORRY-- YOU HAD CONTACT WITH STATE ATTORNEY JOHNNY HARDIMAN, IS THAT CORRECT?

    A I DIDNT CONTACT HER, DOUG HARTMAN DID. DOUG HARTMAN WAS MY ATTORNEY.

    Q WHAT HAPPENED WITH THAT ENCOUNTER. WHEN SHE MET HIM ON BEHALF OF YOU?

    A I WASNT THERE SO DOUG HAD A CONVERSATION WITH JOHNNY HARDIMAN, SHE ADVISED HIM OF WHAT THESE ALLEGATIONS WERE AND WHAT THE POSSIBLE CRIMINAL ALLEGATIONS WERE. AND THEN I TOLD DOUG THAT I HAVE NO INTENTIONS OF DOING ANYTHING LIKE THIS. THAT IS WHEN I FIRST LEARNED ABOUT THE GENTLEMEN WHO IS, I BELIEVE IT WAS THE ONE THAT WAS REPOSSESSED.

    MR. COYLE: LET ME INTERRUPT FOR ONE SECOND, SERGEANT.
    I DONT WANT HIM TO BLATANTLY DISCLOSE ANY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEY/CLIENT PRIVILEGE THAT HE HAD WITH HIS ATTORNEY, WITH DOUG HARTMAN. SO, I GUESS, OBVIOUSLY IT SEEMS, WITH THE CLOSED OUT MEMO THAT DOUG HARTMAN SPOKE TO JOHNNY HARDIMAN THAT IS IN THERE, I DONT KNOW IF ANYTHING SPECIFIC THAT YOU NEED.

    SERGEANT MAHARAJ: WHAT I WOULD LIKE HIM TO EXPLAIN IS IF THERE EVER HAS BEEN SOME TYPE OF AGREEMENT THAT HE PAY BACK SUNPASS TOLL TO CORRECT THE SITUATION THAT OCCURRED.

    MR. COYLE: OKAY.

    THE WITNESS: IN ANSWER TO THAT QUESTION, YES THERE WAS.

    SERGEANT MAHARAJ:

    Q TELL ME A LITTLE ABOUT THAT. HOW YOU ADDRESSED THE SITUATION

    A ONCE I FOUND OUT ABOUT THE, AND I DONT REMEMBER THE GENTLEMEN'S NAME, JUST IN GLANCING OVER THE FILE, I FOUND OUT ABOUT THAT, I TOLD DOUG THAT I WAS MORTIFIED THAT SOMEBODY ACTUALLY HAD SOME PROBLEMS BECAUSE OF THIS. I ASKED HIM WHAT WE COULD DO TO FIX IT. AND HE GOT IN TOUCH WITH JOHNNY AND JOHNNY GOT IN TOUCH WITH THE PEOPLE AT FLEET, AND THEY GAVE US THE NUMBER THAT WOULD RECTIFY THE SITUATION. AND I GOT THE MONEY AND RECTIFIED THE SITUATION AND SENT THE PAPERS

    Q IS THERE ANYTHING THAT I HAVE FAILED TO ASK YOU THAT YOU WOULD LIKE TO ADD TO THE STATEMENT?

    A NO MA'AM.

    MR. COYLE: I DONT HAVE ANY. THANK YOU.

    SERGEANT MAHARAJ: HAS EVERYTHING YOU SAID BEEN THE TRUTH, TO THE BEST OF YOUR KNOWLEDGE?

    A YES. ( ABSOLUTE AND COMPLETE BULLSHIT)!!!

    NO ABSOLUTELY EVERYTHING TESTIFIED TO HAS BEEN BULLSHIT.

    1) WHY WASN'T HE ASKED TO PRODUCE HIS METHOD OF PAYMENT FOR THE TAGS ONLINE? LIKE MAYBE A CREDIT/DEBIT CARD STATEMENT OR RECEIPTS SHOWING THE PURCHASE?

    2) WHY SO MUCH OVERTIME? WHY WOULD YOU HAVE A STANDARD SCHEDULE AS OVERTIME WOULD ALLOW "AND THINGS OF THAT NATURE"?

    3) OK SIR, WE CAN "A VERY LITTLE BIT" SEE YOUR POINT OF THE TAGS BUT WHAT COULD POSSIBLY BE YOUR EXCUSE FOR NOT UTILIZING THE SUNPASS THAT THESE "SUPER SMART CRIMINALS" WOULD HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO WAY OF TRACING. EVEN THOUGH THERE'S NO WAY FOR THEM TO TRACE THE " CONFIDENTIAL TAG"

    ADDITIONALLY, BEING THE SEASONED VETERAN YOU ARE, YOU KNOW FOR A FACT THAT IF ANYONE RUNS A CONFIDENTIAL TAG IT "RED FLAGS" AND YOUR IMMEDIATELY NOTIFIED. CORRECT?

    4) YOU ASKED HIM IF HE EVER RAN THE UNAUTHORIZED TAGS AND HE STATED NO. A SIMPLE TAL 6 ON YOUR PART SEARCH IN FCIC/NCIC WOULD SHOW IF AND WHO EVER RAN THOSE TAGS. WHY WASN'T THAT ASKED OR COMPLETED?

    WHY WASN'T A SUBPOENA SENT TO THE ONLINE COMPANY ASKING FOR ANY TAGS PURCHASED BY THIS CRIMINAL?
    PROBABLY BECAUSE THAT WOULD HAVE SHOWN HIM TO BE THR LIAR AND THIEF THAT EVERYONE KNOWS HE IS.

    5) WHY WOULD HE REFER TO ASSISTANT STATE ATTORNEY JOHNNY HARDIMAN AS THE STATE ATTORNEY? WHY WOULD HE REFER TO HER AS "JOHNNY" IF THEY WEREN'T FRIENDS AND DRINKING BUDDIES?

    6) WHY WASN'T HE ASKED HOW MANY TIMES HE ACTUALLY DEFRAUDED THE STATE BECAUSE THEY DIDNT HAVE THE MANPOWER TO WATCH EVERY TAPE, ONLY THE BEGINNING AND ENDING OF EACH MONTH THIS CRIMINAL STOLE BECAUSE IT HAPPENED SO FREQUENTLY THIS THIEF WOULD HAVE OWED THOUSANDS MORE THAN THE COUPLE OF THOUSAND HE PAID.

    7) WHY WASN'T HE RESPONSIBLE TO PAY FOR THE STATE EMPLOYEES TIME TO VIEW THOSE TAPES AS ANY OTHER CRIMINAL WOULD BE? ESPECIALLY SINCE HE OWES THOUSANDS MORE THAN THEY HAD THE TIME YO COUNT. SO ONCE AGAIN HE GETS AWAY WITH STEALING THOUSANDS FROM THE CITIZENS OF THE STATE BECAUSE HE RAN SO MANY TOLLS, THEY DIDNT HAVE THE MANPOWER TO SIT AND COUNT THE THOUSANDS OF TIMES.

    THIS ENTIRE BULLSHIT INVESTIGATION WILL BE POSTED AND YOU CAN JUDGE FOR YOURSELVES AND COME TO YOUR OWN CONCLUSIONS.

    HERE'S MY QUESTION:
    SERGEANT AIMEE MAHARAJ AND EDWIN CABRERA HANDLED HIM WITH SUCH KID GLOVES ARE THEY PART OF THE FRIENDS AND FAMILY OR WERE THEY INSTRUCTED TO HANDLE THE INVEDTIGATION AS POORLY AS THEY DID?

    THEY HAD HIM DEAD TO RIGHTS ON THE PLATES AND ESPECIALLY ON THE NON USE OF THE SUNPASS. HE COULDN'T ANSWER IT BECAUSE EVERYONE KNOWS IT WAS SO HIS GRAND THEFT OF OVERTIME COULDN'T BR TRACKED.

    THERE IS NO OTHER EXPLANATION. PRODUCE AN EMAIL YOU POS THAT SHOWS YOU PURCHASED THOSE TAGS FROM ONLINE AND DIDN'T CONFISCATE THEM FROM ILLIGALS DOWN SOUTH. YOU CAN'T, YOUR A LYING POS. ALWAYS HAVE BEEN ALWAYS WILL BE!!

    MAHARAJ AND CABRERA, SIMPLE TAL 6 WILL TELL YOU WHO AND WHEN THOSE TAGS WERE EVER RAN AND BY WHAT AGENCY, THE OPERATOR, AND THE REQUESTING OFFICER.

    THIS ISNT DEAD, THE STATEWIDE PROSECUTORS OFFICE IS VERY INTERESTED. THEY LOVE GOING AFTER DIRTY LYING COPS.

    SLEEP TIGHT FATS!

    MUCH, MUCH MORE TO COME FELLAS!

    End of page 2

  3. #13
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    LOL right and trump wouldnt win the election. FAKE NEWS.
    Ask Fatboy just how fake all this news is. The only think fake is the thing your wife crams up your ass every week for that prostate rub you love so much.

    There is so much more information coming out on your friend he's going to ask if he can cram his head up your ass and tickle your prostate with his tongue instead of your wife using her strap-on, on you.

  4. #14
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    A I DIDNT THINK THAT IT WOULD COME UP BECAUSE i ASSUMED IT WAS TAGS TO BE DEAD. I DIDNT EVEN THINK THAT THERE WOULD BE ANY WAY BACK TO COLLECT ANY MONEY FOR THE SUN PASS. I WASNT TRYING TO AVOID SUN PASS. IT WAS JUST THEY ARE ON THE CAR AND I DIDNT USE A SUN PASS. AND I DID NOT SO TO MAINTAIN THE ANONYMITY OF THE INVESTIGATIONS THAT WE WERE WORKING.

    Q EXPLAIN A LITTLE BIT MORE IN DETAIL WHY YOU DIDNT USE THE COUNTY SUN PASS THAT WAS ASSIGNED TO THE VEHICLES.

    A OUR COUNTY SUN PASSES ARE SUBJECT TO 119 RECORDS REQUESTS, LOST AND BASED ON THE TYPE OF PEOPLE THAT WE INVESTIGATED AND THE RESOURCES THAT THOSE PEOPLE AND THE CORPORATIONS AND WHATNOT HAVE, THEY WOULD HAVE THE SAME IF NOT BETTER RESOURCES THAN WE DO TO DISCOVER RECORDS AND FIGURE OUT LOCATIONS, WHETHER IT WOULD BE THROUGH SUN PASS TAG CHECK AND WHATNOT. SO THAT IS THE REASON WHY I DID NOT USE THE SUN PASS.

    Q DID YOU EVER HAVE THE INTENTION TO ACTUALLY DEFRAUD THE SUN PASS TOLL COMPANY?

    A ABSOLUTELY NOT. Q ARE YOU AWARE OF THE CONSEQUENCES THAT YOUR ACTION CAUSED?
    I WAS INFORMED OF WHAT HAPPENED TO ONE, PARTICULARLY ONE OF THE PEOPLE INVOLVED, YES.

    Q DO YOU KNOW MR. MARLON MORRIS OR RENE ARMENDARIZ OR JUAN LUNA?

    A I DO NOT KNOW THEM.

    Q AS A RESULT OF HAVING UTILIZED THE UNAUTHORIZED FLORIDA TAG 653 WUM, WHICH WAS NOT ASSIGNED TO ANY DEPARTMENTAL ISSUED VEHICLE, YOU INCURRED ONE THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED TWENTY ONE DOLLARS AND SEVEN CENTS OF UNPAID SUN PASS TOLLS, IS THAT CORRECT?

    A YES MA'AM.

    Q AND THE TEXAS TAG S76NTS YOU INCURRED TWO HUNDRED AND SIXTEEN DOLLARS AND NINETEEN CENTS, IS THAT CORRECT?

    A YES MA'AM

    Q AS A RESULT OF UTILIZING THE FLORIDA TAG AND INCURRING SEVERAL SUNPASS TOLLS VIOLATIONS, ARE YOU AWARE THAT YOU CAUSED THE REGISTERED OWNER, WHICH IS MR. MARLON MORRIS DRIVER'S LICENSE TO BECOME SUSPENDED?

    A I WAS MADE AWARE OF THAT, YES.

    Q WHEN DID YOU BECOME AWARE OF THAT?

    A NOT UNTIL AFTER YOU GUYS DELIVERED THE PRIOR-TO-LETTER.

    Q HOWEVER, PRIOR TO THAT YOU HAD NO KNOWLEDGE?

    A I HAD NO CLUE.

    Q TO THE BEST OF YOUR RECOLLECTION, GOING BACK TO TUESDAY, JANUARY 11, 2011, YOU WERE DRIVING THE CHEVY, COLORADO AND COMMITTED A TRAFFIC INFRACTION WHERE YOU WERE UTILIZING THE FLORIDA TAG 654 WUM AT THE INTERSECTION OF NORTHWEST 207 STREET AND 27 AVENUE. WERE YOU AWARE THAT THIS INFRACTION OCCURRED WHICH WAS TO A RED LIGHT TRAFFIC CITATION ON A CAMERA?

    A NO, I WAS NOT.

    Q YOU PREVIOUSLY MENTIONED THAT YOU WOULD USE THESE TAGS AND CHANGE THEM PERIODICALLY BECAUSE OF YOUR SURVEILLANCE DETAILS ON CERTAIN CASES YOU WERE WORKING ON, CORRECT?

    A CORRECT.

    Q CLARIFY. IF YOU HAD A CONFIDENTIAL TAG WHICH DOES NOT COME BACK IF THEY RUN IT IN THE SYSTEM, WHY DID YOU DECIDE TO USE THESE OTHER TAGS AND NOT STAY WITH THE CONFIDENTIAL TAG?

    A BECAUSE OF THE LEVEL OF CRIMINALS THAT WE WERE DEALING WITH AND THE LEVEL OF INVESTIGATIONS THAT WE WERE DEALING WITH, WE WOULD INVESTIGATE PEOPLE WITH NUMEROUS RESOURCES, THE SAME OR BETTER THAN WHAT WE HAD, AND A LOT OF PEOPLE WITH A LOT OF POLITICAL PULL BECAUSE WE WERE WORKING IN PUBLIC CORRUPTION, POLITICIANS, OTHER POLICE DEPARTMENTS, OTHER POLICE OFFICERS, HIGHLY LEVEL COUNTY EMPLOYEES. AND BASED ON THE FACT THAT WE WERE DEALING WITH A SMARTER CALIBER OF CRIMINALS THAN THE NORMAL PERSON, THEY WOULD FIGURE OUT THAT IF THEY RAN A TAG AND IT CAME BACK AS A CONFIDENTIAL TAG OR A NOT ON FILE TAG, THAT THEY WOULD ASSUME THAT IT WAS A POLICE CAR, A POLICE VEHICLE, AND THUS COMPROMISE THE INVESTIGATION.

    Q AT ANY POINT DURING THE TIME THAT YOU UTILIZED THE TAGS, DID YOU UTILIZE THESE TAGS AND RUN THE SUN PASS WHILE GOING TO AND FROM WORK?

    A IT IS VERY POSSIBLE YES.

    Q ON JUNE 13, 2014 1 LITTLE BIT PRIOR TO THAT YOU RECEIVED A PRIOR-TO-LETTER. HOWEVER, ON JUNE 14,--ON JUNE 13, I AM SORRY-- YOU HAD CONTACT WITH STATE ATTORNEY JOHNNY HARDIMAN, IS THAT CORRECT?

    A I DIDNT CONTACT HER, DOUG HARTMAN DID. DOUG HARTMAN WAS MY ATTORNEY.

    Q WHAT HAPPENED WITH THAT ENCOUNTER. WHEN SHE MET HIM ON BEHALF OF YOU?

    A I WASNT THERE SO DOUG HAD A CONVERSATION WITH JOHNNY HARDIMAN, SHE ADVISED HIM OF WHAT THESE ALLEGATIONS WERE AND WHAT THE POSSIBLE CRIMINAL ALLEGATIONS WERE. AND THEN I TOLD DOUG THAT I HAVE NO INTENTIONS OF DOING ANYTHING LIKE THIS. THAT IS WHEN I FIRST LEARNED ABOUT THE GENTLEMEN WHO IS, I BELIEVE IT WAS THE ONE THAT WAS REPOSSESSED.

    MR. COYLE: LET ME INTERRUPT FOR ONE SECOND, SERGEANT.
    I DONT WANT HIM TO BLATANTLY DISCLOSE ANY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEY/CLIENT PRIVILEGE THAT HE HAD WITH HIS ATTORNEY, WITH DOUG HARTMAN. SO, I GUESS, OBVIOUSLY IT SEEMS, WITH THE CLOSED OUT MEMO THAT DOUG HARTMAN SPOKE TO JOHNNY HARDIMAN THAT IS IN THERE, I DONT KNOW IF ANYTHING SPECIFIC THAT YOU NEED.

    SERGEANT MAHARAJ: WHAT I WOULD LIKE HIM TO EXPLAIN IS IF THERE EVER HAS BEEN SOME TYPE OF AGREEMENT THAT HE PAY BACK SUNPASS TOLL TO CORRECT THE SITUATION THAT OCCURRED.

    MR. COYLE: OKAY.

    THE WITNESS: IN ANSWER TO THAT QUESTION, YES THERE WAS.

    SERGEANT MAHARAJ:

    Q TELL ME A LITTLE ABOUT THAT. HOW YOU ADDRESSED THE SITUATION

    A ONCE I FOUND OUT ABOUT THE, AND I DONT REMEMBER THE GENTLEMEN'S NAME, JUST IN GLANCING OVER THE FILE, I FOUND OUT ABOUT THAT, I TOLD DOUG THAT I WAS MORTIFIED THAT SOMEBODY ACTUALLY HAD SOME PROBLEMS BECAUSE OF THIS. I ASKED HIM WHAT WE COULD DO TO FIX IT. AND HE GOT IN TOUCH WITH JOHNNY AND JOHNNY GOT IN TOUCH WITH THE PEOPLE AT FLEET, AND THEY GAVE US THE NUMBER THAT WOULD RECTIFY THE SITUATION. AND I GOT THE MONEY AND RECTIFIED THE SITUATION AND SENT THE PAPERS

    Q IS THERE ANYTHING THAT I HAVE FAILED TO ASK YOU THAT YOU WOULD LIKE TO ADD TO THE STATEMENT?

    A NO MA'AM.

    MR. COYLE: I DONT HAVE ANY. THANK YOU.

    SERGEANT MAHARAJ: HAS EVERYTHING YOU SAID BEEN THE TRUTH, TO THE BEST OF YOUR KNOWLEDGE?

    A YES. ( ABSOLUTE AND COMPLETE BULLSHIT)!!!

    NO ABSOLUTELY EVERYTHING TESTIFIED TO HAS BEEN BULLSHIT.

    1) WHY WASN'T HE ASKED TO PRODUCE HIS METHOD OF PAYMENT FOR THE TAGS ONLINE? LIKE MAYBE A CREDIT/DEBIT CARD STATEMENT OR RECEIPTS SHOWING THE PURCHASE?

    2) WHY SO MUCH OVERTIME? WHY WOULD YOU HAVE A STANDARD SCHEDULE AS OVERTIME WOULD ALLOW "AND THINGS OF THAT NATURE"?

    3) OK SIR, WE CAN "A VERY LITTLE BIT" SEE YOUR POINT OF THE TAGS BUT WHAT COULD POSSIBLY BE YOUR EXCUSE FOR NOT UTILIZING THE SUNPASS THAT THESE "SUPER SMART CRIMINALS" WOULD HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO WAY OF TRACING. EVEN THOUGH THERE'S NO WAY FOR THEM TO TRACE THE " CONFIDENTIAL TAG"

    ADDITIONALLY, BEING THE SEASONED VETERAN YOU ARE, YOU KNOW FOR A FACT THAT IF ANYONE RUNS A CONFIDENTIAL TAG IT "RED FLAGS" AND YOUR IMMEDIATELY NOTIFIED. CORRECT?

    4) YOU ASKED HIM IF HE EVER RAN THE UNAUTHORIZED TAGS AND HE STATED NO. A SIMPLE TAL 6 ON YOUR PART SEARCH IN FCIC/NCIC WOULD SHOW IF AND WHO EVER RAN THOSE TAGS. WHY WASN'T THAT ASKED OR COMPLETED?

    WHY WASN'T A SUBPOENA SENT TO THE ONLINE COMPANY ASKING FOR ANY TAGS PURCHASED BY THIS CRIMINAL?
    PROBABLY BECAUSE THAT WOULD HAVE SHOWN HIM TO BE THR LIAR AND THIEF THAT EVERYONE KNOWS HE IS.

    5) WHY WOULD HE REFER TO ASSISTANT STATE ATTORNEY JOHNNY HARDIMAN AS THE STATE ATTORNEY? WHY WOULD HE REFER TO HER AS "JOHNNY" IF THEY WEREN'T FRIENDS AND DRINKING BUDDIES?

    6) WHY WASN'T HE ASKED HOW MANY TIMES HE ACTUALLY DEFRAUDED THE STATE BECAUSE THEY DIDNT HAVE THE MANPOWER TO WATCH EVERY TAPE, ONLY THE BEGINNING AND ENDING OF EACH MONTH THIS CRIMINAL STOLE BECAUSE IT HAPPENED SO FREQUENTLY THIS THIEF WOULD HAVE OWED THOUSANDS MORE THAN THE COUPLE OF THOUSAND HE PAID.

    7) WHY WASN'T HE RESPONSIBLE TO PAY FOR THE STATE EMPLOYEES TIME TO VIEW THOSE TAPES AS ANY OTHER CRIMINAL WOULD BE? ESPECIALLY SINCE HE OWES THOUSANDS MORE THAN THEY HAD THE TIME YO COUNT. SO ONCE AGAIN HE GETS AWAY WITH STEALING THOUSANDS FROM THE CITIZENS OF THE STATE BECAUSE HE RAN SO MANY TOLLS, THEY DIDNT HAVE THE MANPOWER TO SIT AND COUNT THE THOUSANDS OF TIMES.

    THIS ENTIRE BULLSHIT INVESTIGATION WILL BE POSTED AND YOU CAN JUDGE FOR YOURSELVES AND COME TO YOUR OWN CONCLUSIONS.

    HERE'S MY QUESTION:
    SERGEANT AIMEE MAHARAJ AND EDWIN CABRERA HANDLED HIM WITH SUCH KID GLOVES ARE THEY PART OF THE FRIENDS AND FAMILY OR WERE THEY INSTRUCTED TO HANDLE THE INVEDTIGATION AS POORLY AS THEY DID?

    THEY HAD HIM DEAD TO RIGHTS ON THE PLATES AND ESPECIALLY ON THE NON USE OF THE SUNPASS. HE COULDN'T ANSWER IT BECAUSE EVERYONE KNOWS IT WAS SO HIS GRAND THEFT OF OVERTIME COULDN'T BR TRACKED.

    THERE IS NO OTHER EXPLANATION. PRODUCE AN EMAIL YOU POS THAT SHOWS YOU PURCHASED THOSE TAGS FROM ONLINE AND DIDN'T CONFISCATE THEM FROM ILLIGALS DOWN SOUTH. YOU CAN'T, YOUR A LYING POS. ALWAYS HAVE BEEN ALWAYS WILL BE!!

    MAHARAJ AND CABRERA, SIMPLE TAL 6 WILL TELL YOU WHO AND WHEN THOSE TAGS WERE EVER RAN AND BY WHAT AGENCY, THE OPERATOR, AND THE REQUESTING OFFICER.

    THIS ISNT DEAD, THE STATEWIDE PROSECUTORS OFFICE IS VERY INTERESTED. THEY LOVE GOING AFTER DIRTY LYING COPS.

    SLEEP TIGHT FATS!

    MUCH, MUCH MORE TO COME FELLAS!

    End of page 2
    The thought of that fat pig lying through his teeth to save his white ass sickens me. This MF is a pathological liar and as such he would not even fail a polygraph because he has no emotions or conscience. Why didn't they ask him about how he accosted Det. David Colon his male subordinate and how then Lt. Andrew Glass and PCB dismissed the complaint and covered it up. This bisexual sack of shit lured the detective to his house and put the moves on him. The detective is a married decent man and walked away. Had it been anybody else that lard ass would have been sucking soup through a straw for six months with a broken jaw. Depose Glass, he is the one who allowed this POS to go after you guys in Golden Beach.

  5. #15
    Unregistered
    Guest
    here is the funniest part;

    A BECAUSE OF THE LEVEL OF CRIMINALS THAT WE WERE DEALING WITH AND THE LEVEL OF INVESTIGATIONS THAT WE WERE DEALING WITH, WE WOULD INVESTIGATE PEOPLE WITH NUMEROUS RESOURCES, THE SAME OR BETTER THAN WHAT WE HAD, AND A LOT OF PEOPLE WITH A LOT OF POLITICAL PULL BECAUSE WE WERE WORKING IN PUBLIC CORRUPTION, POLITICIANS, OTHER POLICE DEPARTMENTS, OTHER POLICE OFFICERS, HIGHLY LEVEL COUNTY EMPLOYEES. AND BASED ON THE FACT THAT WE WERE DEALING WITH A SMARTER CALIBER OF CRIMINALS THAN THE NORMAL PERSON, THEY WOULD FIGURE OUT THAT IF THEY RAN A TAG AND IT CAME BACK AS A CONFIDENTIAL TAG OR A NOT ON FILE TAG, THAT THEY WOULD ASSUME THAT IT WAS A POLICE CAR, A POLICE VEHICLE, AND THUS COMPROMISE THE INVESTIGATION.

    it was a young teller at a park per the herald who was the subject not a doper or org crime figure

  6. #16
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Did the dispo panel sustain the allegations and if not why not if yes what did the director decide to do

  7. #17
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    Did the dispo panel sustain the allegations and if not why not if yes what did the director decide to do
    Dade county is a cesspool of corruption. Don't fret though, the statewide prosecutor has taken an interest especially with the Federal Judge's recent decision. It's being tracked closely. Justice will be served one way or another.
    Here's a hint Fatboy, don't spend all that GoFundMe money on Christmas gifts. You'll need it soon enough.

  8. #18
    Unregistered
    Guest
    You keep telling yourself it's Fake News. It's in black and white. Do a public records request for yourself. All the information is there for you to go request it yourself. It's All public record. All of the State, County , and especially MDPD officers that receive or have received different treatment have a right to know. WE Will KEEP airing your Dirty laundry and unlawful ways daily, monthly, yearly. A call has already been placed into the Internal Revenue Service. Also Sullivan wife sells things, has a little side business that she does not claim as income. You keep telling yourself it's "Fake News" trust me were not fake, were not making things up.

    Signed by:
    Karma.

  9. #19
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Several formal complaints have already been written per IRS requirements, as well as several certified copies send to the Internal Revenue Service Investigations Unit on Sullivan and his wife.

    Thank you for the direction of our next travels. Whoever wrote this below. Thank you again.

    "If mr Sullivan did indeed, as stated above, make "full payment" of the tolls incurred, then effectively acknowledged that he received a monetary benefit and he needs to amend his tax returns for those year(s) and file a 1040X for each year because the benefit received at the time would/should have been recognized as "income" and the resultant toll expense, insomuch as it constituted a PLE (personal living expense) would have been a non-deductible expense.

    you guys need to forward this to the FBI agent that started the whole thing and have him forward the information to the IRS. (or you could make the referral yourself and collect a finders fee, but you have to have concrete facts). Because I am sure that even a moderately competent Revenue Agent would be able to identify more income issues on this individual's tax returns than just the sunpass "issue".


    Mr. Moderator they will try and silence this through you. We encourage you to look at this Public Record knowledge for yourself. Then make your decision. Thank you. 119.07 is in place for many reasons, to include this.

  10. #20
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    Several formal complaints have already been written per IRS requirements, as well as several certified copies send to the Internal Revenue Service Investigations Unit on Sullivan and his wife.

    Thank you for the direction of our next travels. Whoever wrote this below. Thank you again.

    "If mr Sullivan did indeed, as stated above, make "full payment" of the tolls incurred, then effectively acknowledged that he received a monetary benefit and he needs to amend his tax returns for those year(s) and file a 1040X for each year because the benefit received at the time would/should have been recognized as "income" and the resultant toll expense, insomuch as it constituted a PLE (personal living expense) would have been a non-deductible expense.

    you guys need to forward this to the FBI agent that started the whole thing and have him forward the information to the IRS. (or you could make the referral yourself and collect a finders fee, but you have to have concrete facts). Because I am sure that even a moderately competent Revenue Agent would be able to identify more income issues on this individual's tax returns than just the sunpass "issue".


    Mr. Moderator they will try and silence this through you. We encourage you to look at this Public Record knowledge for yourself. Then make your decision. Thank you. 119.07 is in place for many reasons, to include this.
    The once Hunters have now become the Hunted.
    The legal way.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 18 FirstFirst 123412 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •