Langlais road rage trial starts today

Unregistered · 10-24-2016, 12:14 PM

Originally Posted by Unregistered

She was convicted of 2 misdemeanors and sentenced to 364 days in jail by an over zealous judge B Burgess. Couldn't get his felony conviction so he hammers her with a sentence he prob has ever given anybody for two misdemeanors. Jails full and we have ADAP but sentence a first time offender to that unthinkable. It was all done in an effort to discredit her because of other factors coming to light in this case.

such as......

Unregistered · 10-24-2016, 08:30 PM

How come she wasn't processed thru APAD since it was a misdemeanor crime? She never been arrested before.

Unregistered · 10-24-2016, 09:20 PM

Originally Posted by Unregistered

How come she wasn't processed thru APAD since it was a misdemeanor crime? She never been arrested before.

She was charged with a felony DB!

Unregistered · 10-24-2016, 09:40 PM

Originally Posted by Unregistered

She was charged with a felony DB!

Charged with a felony convicted of two misdemeanors DB

Unregistered · 10-24-2016, 09:45 PM

Originally Posted by Unregistered

Charged with a felony convicted of two misdemeanors DB

We all know that the Courts will often agree to a lesser charge to keep the felony conviction off of the record, but give them the max on the lesser charge.

Unregistered · 10-24-2016, 09:48 PM

Originally Posted by Unregistered

Charged with a felony convicted of two misdemeanors DB

SAO full of crap and couldn't get her convicted of a felony. Jury prevailed and do to a unchecked and unbalanced justice system someone has to spend a year in jail.

Unregistered · 10-25-2016, 02:37 AM

Originally Posted by Unregistered

SAO full of crap and couldn't get her convicted of a felony. Jury prevailed and do to a unchecked and unbalanced justice system someone has to spend a year in jail.

If she drew down on your family for a stupid reason you might have a different opinion.

Unregistered · 10-25-2016, 12:29 PM

Originally Posted by Unregistered

If she drew down on your family for a stupid reason you might have a different opinion.

Victims don't follow and engage other parties in a verbal confrontation with occupants including a child in the car. Victims are not reluctant to prosecute and only do so after being proaded by the SAO. If holding a gun up in a vehicle because you are in fear of an impending attack then stand your ground was not used in arguments during the trial. Langlis might be a nut but this case was all about politics.