Double standard - Page 7
Page 7 of 8 FirstFirst ... 5678 LastLast
Results 61 to 70 of 77
 

Thread: Double standard

  1. #61
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    Whatever. She is ****ing a criminal. When you put a gigantic bullseye on your butt expect a few shots from those who get ****ed.
    Who got ****end?
        

  2. #62
    Unregistered
    Guest

    Re: nothing forgotten

    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    My how quickly we forget......is she the only supervisor that has made some mistakes? Certainly you remember about the jail supervisors who were viewing inappropriate material (porn) on agency computers while on duty? Only one of those was demoted. There are other supervisors who have made mistakes, they've been addressed and it's time to move on. What about you? Should the agency hold your mistakes over your head forever?
    Some of us haven't forgotten...once agn, supervisors should be held to a higher standard...AND YES...they do hold some folks mistakes over their head forever...BUT not if you're in the click...
        

  3. #63
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    So I went and checked the clerks website. He's not a convicted felon so what policy should she be disciplined for?
    How bout ETHICS....oh that's right, there are none at SR...
        

  4. #64
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    NEWS FLASH! will you stupid a-- co's stay off of this page. LEO AFFAIRS stands for law enforcement officers, not stupid co's who work in the jail. If you want to whine about something, start your own stupid page. The mod needs to step up and get this sh-- off of this page. Just jealous kids who needs their mama's ninny.
    Hey obviously you are the stupid one...go brush up on your FSS...CO's are LEOs by statute...
        

  5. #65
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    How bout ETHICS....oh that's right, there are none at SR...
    What "Code of Ethics" was violated? Do you think that having extra marital affairs is an ethical violation? What about neglect of job duties? Do you go out with your coworkers and have drinks, then allow them to drive? Do you go or do you know coworkers who go to concerts or music festivals and "roll"? What about your co-workers who call in all the time? What about your co-workers who don't pay their bills on time and their phone gets shut off? What about the ones that don't really do their head counts? What about all the people carrying their personal cell phones? Aren't all those things violations of the Canon of Ethics and/policy? Yet, I see nothing about those things, strictly vague references to one individual. My guess is that you're either jealous of where she's at or you're jealous because she doesn't want you. Finally, if you truly believe that the Canon of Ethics or agency policy has been violated, you are obligated to report it! So, where is YOUR integrity?
        

  6. #66
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    What "Code of Ethics" was violated? Do you think that having extra marital affairs is an ethical violation? What about neglect of job duties? Do you go out with your coworkers and have drinks, then allow them to drive? Do you go or do you know coworkers who go to concerts or music festivals and "roll"? What about your co-workers who call in all the time? What about your co-workers who don't pay their bills on time and their phone gets shut off? What about the ones that don't really do their head counts? What about all the people carrying their personal cell phones? Aren't all those things violations of the Canon of Ethics and/policy? Yet, I see nothing about those things, strictly vague references to one individual. My guess is that you're either jealous of where she's at or you're jealous because she doesn't want you. Finally, if you truly believe that the Canon of Ethics or agency policy has been violated, you are obligated to report it! So, where is YOUR integrity?
    So that means we can date someone who is in an out of jail without repercussions? For example, lets say I liked doing things with this guywho has numerous mugshots...that's ok?? I can date him without worrying about Capt G doing my i.a.? If he beats my ass, gets arrested and it ends up in the paper, and like a complete idiotic dog in heat, I can date him again without going to i.a.?
        

  7. #67
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Will you irrelevant, mindless, half-baked, laughable, idiotic CO'S stay off of our page. No one gives a sh-- about what you think. Go find another job if you are not happy. You are not law enforcement! anyone could do your jobs.
        

  8. #68
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    So that means we can date someone who is in an out of jail without repercussions? For example, lets say I liked doing things with this guywho has numerous mugshots...that's ok?? I can date him without worrying about Capt G doing my i.a.? If he beats my ass, gets arrested and it ends up in the paper, and like a complete idiotic dog in heat, I can date him again without going to i.a.?
    Mugshots do not equal convictions! Don't you remember that phrase, "Innocent until proven guilty in a court of law"? Clearly you don't understand the i.a. process. She doesn't order them to be done. Only Unit 1 has that authority. And how do you know there hasn't been an i.a. done on her? Simply more speculation by people who do not fact check before posting! Oh, and I like how you skirted around the integrity issue! Obviously DG is the only one who should have to worry about that, right?
        

  9. #69
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    Mugshots do not equal convictions! Don't you remember that phrase, "Innocent until proven guilty in a court of law"? Clearly you don't understand the i.a. process. She doesn't order them to be done. Only Unit 1 has that authority. And how do you know there hasn't been an i.a. done on her? Simply more speculation by people who do not fact check before posting! Oh, and I like how you skirted around the integrity issue! Obviously DG is the only one who should have to worry about that, right?
    Unit 1 has that authority, true. But only after his head honchos recommend it. Duh you idiot!
        

  10. #70
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    Unit 1 has that authority, true. But only after his head honchos recommend it. Duh you idiot!
    And the head honchos would be your Shift Supervisor, TG or BS since they are over security. Duh!
        

Page 7 of 8 FirstFirst ... 5678 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •