Results 11 to 16 of 16
-
08-27-2016, 07:59 PM #11KILO MIKEGuest
Thank you guys for the replies, I will continue to research this case? This specific case was brought up at my academy. I wanted to get some advice from road officers and their experience with this type of traffic stop.
Regards,
PO at the academy
-
08-29-2016, 07:45 AM #12UnregisteredGuest
New *****cop huh? How about you read the post you ****ing retard. I think 21 years of experience is probably more than enough to comment on this thread. How about you name it and I will show my balls when I put them on your forehead. SO before you start running your mouth through a keyboard let me know and we can go to the back parking lot of whatever district you hang out in because I'm sure you don't work and settle it like we used to. A**HOLE
-
08-29-2016, 12:02 PM #13
-
08-29-2016, 12:35 PM #14
-
08-29-2016, 07:32 PM #15UnregisteredGuest
-
09-17-2016, 09:08 PM #16UnregisteredGuest
Open and read the below cited US Supreme Court Decision, South Dakota v. Opperman. Then Read the Property and Evidence Control SOP, III. Individual and Departmental Responsibilities, A. 1 through 3 c and therein lies the answer.
Since under Gimenez and Perez there seems to be no frequent, if at all, In-Service Training, reviewing the operational boundaries imposed on policing by the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments, it falls on each officer to do their own due diligence regarding their scope within such Constitutional restrictions.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/428/364
Bookmarks