Can a smart PO answer this ? - Page 2
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 16 of 16
 
  1. #11
    KILO MIKE
    Guest
    Thank you guys for the replies, I will continue to research this case? This specific case was brought up at my academy. I wanted to get some advice from road officers and their experience with this type of traffic stop.

    Regards,

    PO at the academy

  2. #12
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    Wow! Typical new ***** cops that we've been hiring. "The sop says". Always worried about liability. Grow a pair of balls!
    New *****cop huh? How about you read the post you ****ing retard. I think 21 years of experience is probably more than enough to comment on this thread. How about you name it and I will show my balls when I put them on your forehead. SO before you start running your mouth through a keyboard let me know and we can go to the back parking lot of whatever district you hang out in because I'm sure you don't work and settle it like we used to. A**HOLE

  3. #13
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    New *****cop huh? How about you read the post you ****ing retard. I think 21 years of experience is probably more than enough to comment on this thread. How about you name it and I will show my balls when I put them on your forehead. SO before you start running your mouth through a keyboard let me know and we can go to the back parking lot of whatever district you hang out in because I'm sure you don't work and settle it like we used to. A**HOLE
    Que Macho!!!

  4. #14
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    New *****cop huh? How about you read the post you ****ing retard. I think 21 years of experience is probably more than enough to comment on this thread. How about you name it and I will show my balls when I put them on your forehead. SO before you start running your mouth through a keyboard let me know and we can go to the back parking lot of whatever district you hang out in because I'm sure you don't work and settle it like we used to. A**HOLE
    Key board war hero.

  5. #15
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Charlie1 View Post
    Officer Bird was patrolling downtown Center City late Saturday night. Primarily, she was on the lookout for drunk drivers after the bars closed, but violent incidents were on the rise in the area, so she was also looking for suspicious activity. She had just pulled over across the street from the Central Pub when a red sports car went speeding by. Officer Bird turned on her siren and pursued the sports car. The car pulled over, and Officer Bird approached the vehicle. When she got to the door, she noticed the driver shoving something under the front seat. She rapped on the window, and the driver, visibly angry, rolled it down.
“What?” he said.
 Officer Bird told him to step out of the vehicle. The driver slammed the door and stepped toward Officer Bird. She then ordered him to turn around and place his hands on the roof of the vehicle. The man swore, but he complied. Officer Bird did a weapons pat-down and did not find a weapon.
“OK, Sir, now I need to see some identification.” When the man handed over his license, she saw that his name was Alejandro Quintana. Before running his license, she shined her flashlight in the sports car. Sticking out from under the front seat, she saw a revolver. She seized it. In addition, she also saw a small bag containing a white powdery substance next to the revolver. She seized that as well.
“You should see what’s in the trunk,” Quintana said menacingly.
 Officer Bird just placed Quintana under arrest, and did not check out the trunk.

    What are the grounds for a lawful vehicle search after a traffic stop?

    What Supreme Court decision(s) governs this activity?

    Did Officer Bird’s actions (search and arrest) satisfy the constitutional requirement(s)?

    Could Officer Bird have legally searched the trunk? Why or why not?
    Just watch the show COPS!!! This always happens. You'll see.

  6. #16
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Open and read the below cited US Supreme Court Decision, South Dakota v. Opperman. Then Read the Property and Evidence Control SOP, III. Individual and Departmental Responsibilities, A. 1 through 3 c and therein lies the answer.

    Since under Gimenez and Perez there seems to be no frequent, if at all, In-Service Training, reviewing the operational boundaries imposed on policing by the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments, it falls on each officer to do their own due diligence regarding their scope within such Constitutional restrictions.


    https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/428/364

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •