Contract - Page 2
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 21
 

Thread: Contract

  1. #11
    Unregistered
    Guest
    It's nice to see a guy like Adams, who didn't spend anytime in patrol and has been taken care of his entire career, making more than any of the Corporals..! A guy who never had to go through a promotional process to get a raise. He didn't even get any of the Master Patrol program raises back in the day....wtf?...

  2. #12
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Ok folks. The last post was uncalled for.

  3. #13
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    It's nice to see a guy like Adams, who didn't spend anytime in patrol and has been taken care of his entire career, making more than any of the Corporals..! A guy who never had to go through a promotional process to get a raise. He didn't even get any of the Master Patrol program raises back in the day....wtf?...
    You may have a point but you need to keep people's names out of it. Regardless of your opinion of him this is still supposed to be a brotherhood. That type of behavior is exactly what's wrong with law enforcement these days.

  4. #14
    Unregistered
    Guest
    How about we talk about way overpaid office Sergeants unstead.

  5. #15
    Unregistered
    Guest
    How about we stop constantly complaining about everything? Especially something that benefits all of us in the long run.

  6. #16
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    Ya right tough guy. One day if you stay on this job long enough you will be 50 or older and have to do the same PAT as a 22yr old new hire. Here's the contract that we're going to give you, now see how many things people can add in it to equal out the pay bonus we give them. One young Lt, adds a PAT to keep your job and the required wearing of vests, the other as usual came up with let's charge them for $1000 for any negligence damage to the dept. equipment, such an open phrase. What sucks is none of them in the office, which is half the Dept., will ever have to follow any of this and are willing to put it on the workers in patrol. This is the typical thing here that causes a low morale issue and worker complaints.
    Neither LT came up with either of those. Actually the command staff did not have input in the contract from what I heard.

  7. #17
    Unregistered
    Guest

    Smile Equity

    Take home cars for USFSP ?????

  8. #18
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Not a contract issue. At the discretion of the department and university. We could lose them at any time. I'm shocked we have had them for so long. I do feel your pain. Maybe our chiefs can talk about it

  9. #19
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    Take home cars for USFSP ?????
    Has nothing to do with the contract. That is solely at the discretion of the Department and the University.

  10. #20
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    Take home cars for USFSP ?????

    The USFPD in Tampa and the USFPD in St Pete ARE TWO TOTALLY DIFFERENT DEPARTMENTS. We share a Contract that's about it. St. Pete SOP's, Hiring practices/standards , cars, working conditions, amount of work, type of work, expectation of work, dispatching etc are completely different.

    Take home cars have never ever been a contract issue and are provided by the Tampa USFPD's Chief at HIS DISCRETION which at any time he could pull the plug and end it.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •