Detention Dep shooting

[Unregistered]

The "Entitlement" mindset is off the chain. In case you missed it: This crash: Suspect killed while attacking Pasco Co. deputy
http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/re...-investigation

Is that an automobile accident?

[Unregistered]

Just another road deputy that thinks they are great....It does not matter who you are you have the right to defend yourself..good for the deputy the scumbag lost....sorry

[Unregistered]

Just another road deputy that thinks they are great....It does not matter who you are you have the right to defend yourself..good for the deputy the scumbag lost....sorry

Didnt you say it was a crash and were talking about insurance? Well was it a crash or not? And whos paying?

[Unregistered]

The "Entitlement" mindset is off the chain. In case you missed it: This crash: Suspect killed while attacking Pasco Co. deputy
http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/re...-investigation

Crap. You are quoting abcactionnews stories? Stories written based on what Nacho says? You do realize that our PIO Snow White is deeply connected to abcactionnews, right?

How fair and impartial do you think the force fed story truly is?

Back to civil liability......the detention deputy is screwed.

[Unregistered]

Anything is possible and I love conspiracy theories. Some people who watch the X-Files think its a documentary, I'm not one of those people.

[Unregistered]

Really? Did you not see the "Coca-cola" emblem on the side of the truck that smashed into the Detention Deputies truck? Coke is responsible for their trucks. Who's insurance do you think will cover the traffic crash? Surely you don't think it's the deputies fault for allowing a coke truck to crash into his truck.

Cant answer huh? There were no crashes. If the deceased backed onto the Mustang the Mustangs insurance might cover it. If the truck drove into the path of the Coke truck thats an intentional act and might not be covered. Deceased hit the truck intentionally? That's a crime not a crash. The deceased's auto policy doesnt cover using a vehicle in the commission of a crime so no coverage there. Coke? Vehicle was stolen. If Coke was negligent? Maybe. Lesson? If youre not independently wealthy or own a body shop check your insurance policy before you offer up your personal vehicle as an intended roadblock.

Of course someone might ante up but.....

Question is why with a complaining witness was the deceased permitted to go on his way?

[Unregistered]

No matter what side of the coin your on, why don't all you Blog Lawyers let it play out. None of you observed the incident and all that is known is what the media has put out thus far, to include all the crap the A-hole Sheriff has stated. And let's face it, Nocc-Hole shoots his mouth when in front of the camera.(Except when he dose not want to answer certain questions)

[Unregistered]

No matter what side of the coin your on, why don't all you Blog Lawyers let it play out. None of you observed the incident and all that is known is what the media has put out thus far, to include all the crap the A-hole Sheriff has stated. And let's face it, Nocc-Hole shoots his mouth when in front of the camera.(Except when he dose not want to answer certain questions)

Just maybe rapping might make people consider the ramifications before they expose themselves to a world of heartache by doing something stupid next time. And you can bet you cant trust any of them to have your back when the pressure gets put on. Lets see how fast he antes up for the personal vehicles.

[Unregistered]

Not trying to be a smart ass, just trying to understand.

The Sheriff clearly stated "off-duty" detention deputy several times.

If the Detention Deputy has no authority outside the jail, what was this person resisting? He is not a LEO with the authority to arrest or detain outside the jail.

The report also stated that the individual did not follow the "off duty" detention deputies commands, in absence of statutory authority, that person was not required to follow the directions of an "off duty" detention deputy.

In essence he is a private citizen, that was involved in a traffic crash, got into a verbal argument, then a subsequent physical altercation occurred, where he was in fear for his life and fired his personal weapon, killing the other person.

It seems like the "off duty" started the verbal altercation with the individual, if he also initiated the physical altercation, why is he not being charged criminally?

By impeding the individual in the coca-cola truck, the "off duty" detention deputy may have caused the traffic crash.

How is this different than a road rage incident where two people get into a fight and one gets shot & killed? If the "off duty" detention deputy had to official rights or authority?

[Unregistered]

Not trying to be a smart ass, just trying to understand.

The Sheriff clearly stated "off-duty" detention deputy several times.

If the Detention Deputy has no authority outside the jail, what was this person resisting? He is not a LEO with the authority to arrest or detain outside the jail.

The report also stated that the individual did not follow the "off duty" detention deputies commands, in absence of statutory authority, that person was not required to follow the directions of an "off duty" detention deputy.

In essence he is a private citizen, that was involved in a traffic crash, got into a verbal argument, then a subsequent physical altercation occurred, where he was in fear for his life and fired his personal weapon, killing the other person.

It seems like the "off duty" started the verbal altercation with the individual, if he also initiated the physical altercation, why is he not being charged criminally?

By impeding the individual in the coca-cola truck, the "off duty" detention deputy may have caused the traffic crash.

How is this different than a road rage incident where two people get into a fight and one gets shot & killed? If the "off duty" detention deputy had to official rights or authority?

He is a deputy you moron. Don't you know they are all sworn in the jail? Obviously you do not work in the law enforcement profession or you would have known that.