Results 1 to 10 of 33
-
05-21-2016, 06:17 PM #1UnregisteredGuest
Fhp
This question is not meant for disrespect, but why would a trooper ask for a local agency to respond to his crash scene to take a battery that occurred in his presence ? Like seriously is it a policy thing ?
-
05-21-2016, 06:43 PM #2UnregisteredGuest
It's a lazy thing actually. Sounds like the trooper witnessed a crime, so he/she called the cops.
-
05-21-2016, 07:34 PM #3UnregisteredGuest
????
Where did this occur
-
05-21-2016, 08:13 PM #4UnregisteredGuest
Trooper should have worked the battery case. Jeez.
-
05-21-2016, 09:47 PM #5UnregisteredGuest
Returning the favor
I'd say the trooper was sick and tired of being called by deputies 45 minutes away to a short form crash or drivers exchange situation the deputies can and should handle. Two can play the game gumbies.
-
05-21-2016, 10:15 PM #6UnregisteredGuest
-
05-21-2016, 10:58 PM #7UnregisteredGuest
We should've handled both....period.
-
05-21-2016, 11:05 PM #8UnregisteredGuest
-
05-21-2016, 11:39 PM #9UnregisteredGuest
I think this whole thread is bullshit. I don't know of any Trooper who wouldn't take a battery committed in his presence. Sounds like a shit-stirrer to me. Where did this happen? What were the circumstances? Details or it didn't happen.
-
05-22-2016, 01:34 AM #10UnregisteredGuest
Any policy that an SO or PD has created that pigeonholes FHP into being the Crash Scene Officers for their county or boundaries is garbage. It's creation was to shift responsibility that should be shared amongst agencies onto FHP. Any deputy that doesn't blue form a minor, non-injury dent while FHP is getting hammered with calls is a sorry piece of trash. Policy or not.
Bookmarks