90% of those post are truth, those post were published at the Miami Herald.
Results 1 to 7 of 7
 
  1. #1
    WE THE PEOPLE
    Guest

    90% of those post are truth, those post were published at the Miami Herald.

    90% of those post are truth,
    90% of those post are truth, and you knows that, those post were published at the Miami Herald, the Miami News & Diario las Américas also in the news at chs 4, 6, 7,10, 18, 22, 23 & 41.

    I AGREE WITH YOU
    " God help the residents of Sweetwater from some of you."

    Read the other comments or posts made by members of your own Department, and you are going to find out that you guys do not respect anyone including you own comrades.
    90 % of you are a piece of shit.

  2. #2
    Unregistered
    Guest
    NEVER FORGET!! THE NAMES OF THIS GROUP OF TRAITORS.

    1- the commission does have the power to over turn , and make the mayor do as the charter and code say.

    With Mr. RALPH VENTURA, it is clear he has been on Mayor Lopez's side for a long time. so with his verse of the city charters and codes, he made an attempt to steer the commission in the wrong direction.

    As directed in the last 6/15/15 meeting, the commission has the votes to "oust" the mayor from office, through the legal terms or through the recall process! either way Mayor Lopez only has one vote on the commission!!!!!! The commission doesn't need Insolina's vote to get their 5 to 7 split to sue the mayor and throw him out of office.

    Mr. Mayor should know that either way he will be facing a recall come May of 16. this will happen and his willingness to violate city charter/code numerous times while on the news and in the mayors chair.
    The mayor's don't care attitude toward the commission will be his down-fall. he should at least try to fake it a little.

    2- lets go back when Lopez stated on the news that former mayor Diaz didn't care about the law. Lopez is now breaking the city law, now who's the one that doesn't care? Apparently, its only one side depending what side you are on.

    Lopez should have rolled with it and let this first year by, instead he is trying to tip-over a 3000 lb bull. its not going to happen!
    recap;
    - he rumored to fire old command staff, but side he wasn't going to do any firing!

    - SECOND day in office, He gave SOMEONE unknown power to make a list of officers to be TERMINATED,

    - NO BODY KNOWS WHO MADE THE LIST

    - NO BODY KNOWS WHO GAVE THE ORDER TO FIRE

    - NO BODY KNOWS WHY CONVICT RICHARD PICHARDO WAS PRESENT.

    THE ILEGAL TRANSITION BOARD MEMBERS ARE:

    1-Acting Sgt ROBERTO OCHOA (THE SNAKE) was and always will be the snake Lopez used to fire officers.

    2-CATALINO RODRIGUEZ ( EL BOLITERO DE ARROYO APOLO ) was present when some officers were fired.

    3-ISOLINA MAROÑO ( LA BOLETERA) was present when some officers were fired .

    4-SERGIO CABRE ( EL LOCO ) was present when some officers were fired.

    5-LARRY PEREZ ( THE WANNABE ) was present when some officers were fired.

    6-RICHARD PICHARDO ( THE CONVICT) was present when some officers were fired.

    7-CARLOS M. SORDO was present when some officers were fired.

    8-MARIO MIRANDA (THE FLY) was present when some officers were fired.

    9-PLACIDO DIAZ ( THE PUMPKIN HEAD ) was present when some officers were fired.

    10-ORLANDO LOPEZ ( EL CAPO ) was present. when some officers were fired.

    **3- why was CONVICT Richard Pichardo given access to police personnel files, while not being a city employee (civilian or sworn)?

    **4- why was CONVICT RICHARD Pichardo kicked out of the station after HIPPA violation of officers files (almost 3 weeks later)?

    **5- why have only some officers been reinstated after commission vote "all are to return"?

    **6- why was there bias against certain officers to be fired and remain fired?

    **7-if Lopez is "OUSTED", Diaz takes office again! Diaz and the entire commission now knows the real personaliy of ROBERTO OCHOA ( THE SNAKE) and the role played by him this whole time

  3. #3
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Future arrests in the City of Sweetwater.
    Based on the investigations beginning in 2013, there are rumors among city employees that authorities of the federal and state government will begin to arrest some of the ex-policemen of the City like ex-commander Mario Miranda, the ex-policeman and ex-commissioner Catalino Rodríguez, and the active lieutenant Roberto Ochoa,
    as well the ex-chief of Police Roberto Fulgueiras.

  4. #4
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Florida Supreme Court ratified that Gimenez negotiating with malicious intentions
    The Supreme Court of Florida ratified that Mayor Gimenez negotiating in a bad faith with malicious intentions exceeding the powers of the Mayor.

    MIAMI-DADE SEPTEMBER 9 2015.
    MIAMI NEWS- DADE COUNTY.

    The Supreme Court of the State of Florida ratified last Tuesday the decision of the Court of Appeals of the First District in favour of the Miami Dade County Police Benevolent Association (PBA) lawsuit against Mayor Carlos Giménez for overstepping the mark in his functions and exceeding the powers of the Mayor of Miami Dade County.

    The demand or lawsuit took place when Giménez refused to return to the employees of the County 5 % of their benefits of health insurance and he veto the decision or agreement of the Commission of the County in order that the funds were returned.

    After the voting of eight commissioners in favor to return and three against, the mayor Giménez could not impose his idea of not returning to the employees of the Miami Dade County a few concessions that, according to the unions, were done on condition of that they were reverted when the economic conditions were improving.

    At that moment, Mayor Giménez threatened with dismissals or fired employees and of reduction of the police force because, according to the councillor, the voting of the commissioners was deepening the fiscal deficit. For this reason, Giménez veto the decision of the commissioners who, in turn, raised the above mentioned veto in an intense session in February, 2014.

    The PBA (Police Benevolent Association of Miami-Dade) has been one of the organizations that has been faced in a radical way the Mayor Giménez. In the moment in which he veto the decision of the Miami Dade County Commission, the union decided to complain before the Public Employees Relations Commission (PERC) for his unjust practices against the employees.

    " PERC decided that the mayor was negotiating in a bad faith with malicious intentions . Later, the case went to the Court of Appeals of the First District and this one passed that the mayor did not have the legal authority of veto the decisions of the commissioners in a hearing mediation. It was illegal and was exceeding the powers of the mayor ", affirmed Blanca Torrents Greenwood, executive director(principal) of the PBA.

  5. #5
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Mayor Lopez you make a big mistake when you copy and paste Mayor Gimenez policy.
    Mayor Lopez you make a big mistake when you copy and paste Mayor Gimenez.

    Like Mayor Orlando López, Mayor Giménez threatened with dismissals or fired employees and of reduction of the police force, because according to the Mayor, the voting of the commissioners was deepening the fiscal deficit. For that reason, Mayor Giménez like Mayor Lopez veto the decision of the commissioners who, in turn, raised the above mentioned veto in an intense session in February, 2014.

    The PBA (Police Benevolent Association of Miami-Dade) has been one of the organizations that has been faced in a radical way the Mayor Giménez. In the moment in which he veto the decision of the Miami Dade County Commission, the union decided to complain before the Public Employees Relations Commission (PERC) for his unjust practices against the employees.

    " PERC decided that the mayor was negotiating in a bad faith with malicious intentions . Later, the case went to the Court of Appeals of the First District and this one passed that the mayor did not have the legal authority of veto the decisions of the commissioners in a hearing mediation. It was illegal and was exceeding the powers of the mayor ", affirmed Blanca Torrents Greenwood, executive director(principal) of the PBA

  6. #6
    Unregistered
    Guest
    (RICO) Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act.
    (RICO) Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act.

    The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, commonly referred to as the RICO Act or simply RICO, is a United States federal law that provides for extended criminal penalties and a civil cause of action for acts performed as part of an ongoing criminal organization.

    Racketeering is when organized groups run illegal businesses, known as “rackets,” or when an organized crime ring uses legitimate organizations to embezzle funds. Such activities can have devastating consequences for both public and private institutions.

    Consequently, the federal government and numerous state governments have created systems of laws designed to prosecute these criminals.

    Typical Rackets and Their Consequences

    Using RICO to Prosecute Racketeers

    Before Congress enacted laws that specifically combat organized crime, prosecutors found it very difficult to end these rackets. Prosecutors could often convict the lower ranked members of the organizations, because they were the ones who actually performed the illegal activities. However, the masterminds behind the organized crime rings were often much harder to prosecute because they couldn’t be directly connected to any of the crimes.

    In 1978, Congress enacted the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, or RICO, providing prosecutors with the tool they needed to fight organized crime. Many states have enacted similar laws. In order to convict someone under RICO or a state equivalent, it’s no longer necessary to prove the suspect personally committed an illegal activity. Instead, prosecutors must prove:
    The defendant owns and/or manages an organization

  7. #7
    DR. PEPPER
    Guest
    A suicidal person is one who is experiencing a personal suicide crisis.
    "A suicidal person*is one who is experiencing a personal suicide*crisis; that is, he or she is attempting*suicide, is seeking a means to commit suicide, or is contemplating suicide".

    A suicidal person may not ask for help, but that doesn't mean that help isn't wanted. Most people who commit suicide don't want to die—they just want to stop hurting. Suicide prevention starts with recognizing the warning signs and taking them seriously. If you think a friend or family member is considering suicide, you might be afraid to bring up the subject. But talking openly about suicidal thoughts and feelings can save a life.

    If you're thinking about committing suicide, please read Suicide Help or call 1-800-273-TALK in the U.S.! To find a suicide helpline outside the U.S., visit IASP or Suicide.org.

    Understanding and preventing suicide

    The World Health Organization estimates that approximately 1 million people die each year from suicide. What drives so many individuals to take their own lives? To those not in the grips of suicidal depression and despair, it's difficult to understand what drives so many individuals to take their own lives. But a suicidal person is in so much pain that he or she can see no other option.

    Suicide is a desperate attempt to escape suffering that has become unbearable. Blinded by feelings of self-loathing, hopelessness, and isolation, a suicidal person can't see any way of finding relief except through death. But despite their desire for the pain to stop, most suicidal people are deeply conflicted about ending their own lives. They wish there was an alternative to committing suicide, but they just can't see one.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •