Deputy Frank Bybee sues Sheriff Thomas M. Knight - Page 11
Page 11 of 11 FirstFirst ... 91011
Results 101 to 107 of 107
 
  1. #101
    Unregistered
    Guest

    Frank bybee

    KARMA got this piece of crap 👍This time

  2. #102
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    Is this the same Frank Bybee that was arrested, today?
    https://www.newstalkflorida.com/news...empted-murder/
    He's a piece of shit

  3. #103
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    Being a deputy did not make Bybee a good man. Similarly, being the elected sheriff doesn't make Knight a good or an honest man. "Positional authority" does not make someone good or bad. Both Knight and Bybee remain what they are.

    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    He's a piece of shit
    Knight or Bybee?

  4. #104
    Unregistered
    Guest
    According to the Facebook page press release, th Judge dismissed FB's case against the Sheriff's Office

  5. #105
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    According to the Facebook page press release, th Judge dismissed FB's case against the Sheriff's Office
    Funny, Clerknet says the case is open.

  6. #106
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    Funny, Clerknet says the case is open.
    That is funny... This whole thing is a mess

  7. #107
    Unregistered
    Guest

    https://www.gofundme.com/bybeefamily

    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    Is this the same Frank Bybee that was arrested?
    http://forums.leoaffairs.com/showthr...37#post2725537
    The above demonstrates why it is extremely dangerous for an employee in the patrol division (or in detectives) to buck the elected sheriff or his henchmen, for two primary reasons:

    • #1(a) - Eventually, an angry citizen will file a false allegation against you to "get even" with you.
      #1(b) - If you're on Knight's hate list, then the false allegation will be sustained as being valid and then you will be punished (using the complainant's false testimony, which is relied on as being credible, and then it is used as the basis for punishment). If you're not on the hate list, then you will be cleared.

    • #2(a) - Eventually, a crazy person (aka sig. 20) is going to make a crazy false allegation against you.
      #2(b) - If you're on Knight's hate list, then the false allegation will be sustained as being valid and then you will be punished (using the complainant's false testimony, which is relied on as being credible, and then it is used as the basis for punishment). If you're not on the hate list, then you will be cleared.

    Either way, SSO management is cleared because all they have to do is point the finger at the complainant. That's why and how IA is such a useful instrument for corrupt senior level executives in law enforcement.

Page 11 of 11 FirstFirst ... 91011

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •