Really?

[Unregistered]

Because as a very racist AG said Americans are basically cowards when it comes to race. He left off white Americans but he is correct. Why Oh why would someone-anyone get away with using "cracker" on a recorded police radio system? Because others (whites?) were cowards for not complaining.

If that is in Fact true the Chief should fire them as well....Double Standards.....

[underground]

They were fired for Conduct Unbecoming An Officer, not Freedom Of Speech.

http://www.fdle.state.fl.us/Content/...f-Conduct.aspx

Principle Three

Police officers shall perform their duties and apply the law impartially and without prejudice or discrimination.

Rationale

Law enforcement effectiveness requires public trust and confidence. Diverse communities must have faith in the fairness and impartiality of their police. Police officers must refrain from fostering disharmony in their communities based upon diversity, and perform their duties without regard to race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, status with regard to public assistance, disability, sexual orientation or age.

Rules

3.1 Police officers shall provide every person in our society with professional, effective and efficient law enforcement services.

3.2 Police officers shall not express, whether by act, omission or statement, prejudice concerning race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, status with regard to public assistance, disability, sexual orientation or age.

3.3 Police officers shall not allow their law enforcement decisions to be influenced by race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, status with regard to public assistance, disability, sexual orientation or age.

[Unregistered]

Because as a very racist AG said Americans are basically cowards when it comes to race. He left off white Americans but he is correct. Why Oh why would someone-anyone get away with using "cracker" on a recorded police radio system? Because others (whites?) were cowards for not complaining.

They are not cowards but rather realist that know that it will go nowhere and they may be labeled as trouble maker in the end.

[Unregistered]

1st amendment protects him from not being criminally charged not fired from an employer. But it's okay to call another officer a cracker over the radio

Depending on which channel this comment was made depends on whether a FCC law could have been used and the department being penalized.

[Unregistered]

Take a minute a google "Protected Classes"
Yeap; you guest it, white males are the only group not protected in this country.
All of the muts get government protection, government assistance and set-aside minority contracts that they don't have to bid on, and that includes women owned business.
Keep voting Democrat and women judges and while you are at it take an ice pick and stab your testicles.

[Unregistered]

Take a minute a google "Protected Classes"
Yeap; you guest it, white males are the only group not protected in this country.
All of the muts get government protection, government assistance and set-aside minority contracts that they don't have to bid on, and that includes women owned business.
Keep voting Democrat and women judges and while you are at it take an ice pick and stab your testicles.

Yes, because white men have always been oppressed. They had to fight for the right to vote, they had to fight for the right to not go thru a rear entrance, they get paid less than women do for the same work. Poor white men have it really really tough. Calling people "muts" is really classy and bashing women judges. You must be proud of yourself of being a racist and a sexist. Good for you.

[Unregistered]

http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2013/...-demographics/
http://www.payscale.com/gender-lifetime-earnings-gap

[Unregistered]

Yes, because white men have always been oppressed. They had to fight for the right to vote, they had to fight for the right to not go thru a rear entrance, they get paid less than women do for the same work. Poor white men have it really really tough. Calling people "muts" is really classy and bashing women judges. You must be proud of yourself of being a racist and a sexist. Good for you.

When is it going to end though? White males have already paid for the inequality of the last several centuries.

[Unregistered]

Yes, because white men have always been oppressed. They had to fight for the right to vote, they had to fight for the right to not go thru a rear entrance, they get paid less than women do for the same work. Poor white men have it really really tough. Calling people "muts" is really classy and bashing women judges. You must be proud of yourself of being a racist and a sexist. Good for you.

This country was built by white males; they tooke their families across the wilderness, loss wives and children to illness, fought for every inch of progress they made, took chances,created companies, worked day and night to make them successful, mortgaged their homes to create start-ups, and fought in every war they were ask to on behalf of this country and your sorry ass.

What have you done?
Oh, I know, you are a "Community Organizer"

[Unregistered]

Yes, because white men have always been oppressed. They had to fight for the right to vote, they had to fight for the right to not go thru a rear entrance, they get paid less than women do for the same work. Poor white men have it really really tough. Calling people "muts" is really classy and bashing women judges. You must be proud of yourself of being a racist and a sexist. Good for you.

Idiot.......Waaaaaaaaaaa