Results 21 to 27 of 27
-
06-02-2014, 06:19 PM #21
Re: WHAT'S GOING ON WITH THE MANATEE COUNTY INTERNET SEX STI
SSO,
Do you have the facts???? If so, please publish them and we can compare to see who is right.
You seem to know a lot because you were probably involved in the ICAC Task Force Sting/s.
Put your money where your mouth is and show us what you have and I and other will let you know if you are right. There are databases that folks are using to track the information so it would be great to see if you are on target or way off.
:devil: :devil:
-
06-02-2014, 06:45 PM #22
Re: WHAT'S GOING ON WITH THE MANATEE COUNTY INTERNET SEX STI
Originally Posted by HonestJohn
TROLL
-
01-05-2016, 04:55 AM #23UnregisteredGuest
Ruled Entrapped, but charged AGAIN!?
I was arrested in 2013 in an Internet Sex Sting called Cardea. I was charged with Traveling to meet a Minor, and Soliciting a Minor. The charges were ultimately dismissed due to Entrapment. The judge's approval of the Motion to Dismiss states that I was Entrapped by the police, that I was not involved in any illegal activity, and that the officer created the crime. The motion also shows that the investigation into myself was unauthorized.
In 2015 I was randomly arrested and charged with Attempted Lewd & Lascivious Battery on the same fake minor, in the same Criminal Episode from the original case which was already proved to be Entrapment as a matter of law. The State is on record saying there is no new evidence, every detail to the case is the same, except for the charge.
I filed a Writ of Prohibition with the 5th DCA, based on Res Judicata, but the motion was denied Per Curium.
I am an American citizen who is legally disabled, I am deaf. I do not understand how this is possible, that I am being charged for the same Criminal Episode yet again, and it not be a form of Double Jeopardy. I especially do not understand how I can be charged again for the same Criminal Episode, when it has already been proven that the police officer created the crime via Entrapment as a matter of law.
It is my understanding that no one has ever been charged again after a case was proved to be Entrapment. Or at the very least, not in an Internet Sex Sting case that I can find.
Here is a copy of the judge approving my Motion To Dismiss: http://bit.ly/1PbZ8im
Here is a copy of the Writ of Prohibition to the 5th DCA: http://bit.ly/2ndWritofProhib
The next step is obviously to file another Motion to Dismiss based on Entrapment, but I am being told that the courts and judge are doing anything possible to get me in front of a jury for this fake crime I was already tried for, which was proven Entrapment, and created by the police.
Is this really legal? Isn't entrapment a violation of my Constitutional Rights? Isn't this a violation of Due Process? Do people really go to prison for being Entrapped? I'm scared to death!
I am seeking any an all available avenues of advice, as I am looking for legal representation, including Civil. If you yourself, or someone you know can help, please contact me.
Thank you,
David Miller
DigitalDefenseCase@gmail.com
-
01-05-2016, 01:07 PM #24hope this helpsGuest
Hi David.
http://www.iheartmyteacher.org/index...ex-sting.1377/
>>Deaf people are twice as likely to have mental health problems.
>>In a prison population, the rate of sexual offending by deaf offenders is 4 times the rate of sexual offending by hearing offenders.
-
01-05-2016, 03:56 PM #25time's running outGuest
You're a frequent flier in the criminal justice system and you already have a defense attorney. Quit sniveling. It's time to hang with guys your own age, just don't drop the soap in the big house.
David Miller dob 10/1979
http://www.seminoleclerk.org/CriminalDocket/
Seminole County Criminal Court database
2006 Case #592006MM000799A
Unlawful speed
Possession less than 20 g cannabis
Use/Possesion drug parphernalia
Pre-trial diversion
2011 Case #592011MM004658A
Expired DL more than 6 months
Pleaded guilty
2013 Case #592013CF000153A
Possession of not more than 20 g of cannabis, F.S.S. 893.13(6)(B)
Unlawful travel to meet a minor, F.S.S. 847.0135(4)(A)
Computer solicitation of child, F.S.S. 847.0135(3)(A)
Court took no action, removed from docket.
2015 Case #592014CF003826A
Attempted lewd or lascivious battery, F.S.S. 800.04(4)(A) and F.S.S. 777.04(4)(D)
The next pre-trial proceeding is 1/17/2016 at 9:00 a.m.
-
10-14-2016, 05:08 AM #26UnregisteredGuest
-
05-17-2017, 01:42 PM #27UnregisteredGuest
With a record like that, he seems pretty dangerous. If you look it up online, there's now a warrant out for him and he must be running from the law.
Name: MILLER, DAVID MATTHEW
Nicknames:
Aliases:
Offense: Contempt Of Court
Reporting Agency: SEMINOLE CO SO
Agency Case #: 143826CFA
Date of Warrant: 12/20/2016
Warrant #: 143826CFA
Date of Birth: 10/10/1979
Race: WHITE
Sex: MALE
Height: 6' 01"
Weight: 200
Hair Color: BROWN
Eye Color: BROWN
Bookmarks