IAQuestion
Results 1 to 4 of 4
 

Thread: IAQuestion

  1. #1
    Guest

    IAQuestion

    I have a feeling that conducting an IA without interviewing the subject of the IA is legit, It shouldn't be, but it is. PBA needs to change this and make it part of the officers bill of rights which not only lays down the guidelines for interviews, it also makes it a law that there is an interview.

    For example you work for any agency that will conduct an inspection on you for a month or so before the inform you that you are under an IA investigation. You are told there will bw a date and time for your interview. A weel later you get an e mail saying that the IA has be fonished and the charges against you have been founded, even though you were never interviewed, nor any of your witnesses.
    This is not a violation of the officer bill of rights, but it shiould be
    PBA needs to fix thisl.

  2. #2
    Guest

    Re: IAQuestion

    So basically the bill of rights is if you get interviewed. If no interview no bill of rights? This is screwed up and has to be a loop hole. Something needs to be done to fix this.

  3. #3
    Guest

    Re: IAQuestion

    Quote Originally Posted by Guest
    So basically the bill of rights is if you get interviewed. If no interview no bill of rights? This is screwed up and has to be a loop hole. Something needs to be done to fix this.
    Not a loop hole. The rights attach when you are ordered to give a statement. If you aren't ordered, there are very few rights (some, like 180 days, exist regardless of whether a subject interview is conducted). The law is there not to protect against bad investigations but to protect against threatening behavior in the interview of a subject officer.

  4. #4
    Guest

    Re: IAQuestion

    The law needs to make sure there is an interview of the person under the investigation.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •