Justice Seekers Declare War on Chief SS BBPD

SOUND LIKE A SANE SOBER PERSON?????

You can be certain. Whether it's a shady low-life reporter from a small
weekly paper from the island controlled by the BBPD and Chief Sam Speciale?
The reports keep coming in from phone calls and email the Chiefs wife is
having numerous affairs and is a drunk. She chases people from bar to bar
wondering who is taking picture of her....however they could care less about
her, and her RED HAT friends who have already been reported. Paranoia has
struck in Mary Ann's Castaway. The claws come out! Mrs. Speciale follows
patrons to another local pub harassing patrons. The calls come in... The
chief drinks with Joe Genoese, (Genovese) The Chief's wife sleeps around
and drinks more than she can handle. Oh, yes, we need a witness! WE have it!
Keep it up Mr Mark Young with the Islander. Just keep feeding us and LEOAFFAIRS

N O P E

So just to summarize:

1.) Chief S.S. BBPD calls the shots at the local newspaper "The Islander"

2.) The chiefs wife cheats on him constantly and has "numerous affairs"

3.)The chiefs wife is a drunk

4.) The chiefs wife suffers from paranoia and wonders who is taking pictures of her

5.) However? The people who may / may not be taking pictures of her could care less about her? Hmm that sounds odd

6.) The chiefs wife is part of "The red hat society"

7.) Chief S.S. from BBPD enjoy beers with Joe Genoese the man dating the suicidal stripper when she finally hit a home run

8.) Not only does the chiefs wife have affairs but also "sleeps around all the time"

These fairy tale examples were copied straight from the J 4 S website. So, the owner of said website has declared these facts to be true reference Chief S.S. from the BBPD.

THIS POSTING WILL SOON ENOUGH BE WELL KNOWN AS EXHIBIT "M"

YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED

If you feel that you've been a victim of libel or slander, you might try to seek compensation for damages in a civil lawsuit. To be honest, most lawsuits for defamation of character never yield positive results, but if you have enough proof to win your claim, you could have a solid case. Before you file a civil lawsuit for libel or slander, you'll need to prove it, so here are a few tips to get you started.
Prove the Statement was False

In order to win a civil lawsuit for libel or slander, you will need to be able to prove that the statement (either written or spoken) was false. In other words, you have to demonstrate in court that the statement has no element of truth. This can be far more difficult than you would imagine, so it's important that you pay attention to this point.

For example, let's say that a restaurant critic wrote that the food at your establishment was made from cat meat rather than chicken. Obviously, this is a case of libel if you don't, in fact, use cat meat to make your food, but you have to prove that there isn't any cat in the dishes your restaurant serves. This is easy enough - hire an expert witness to test the meat in your restaurant and to testify that it is chicken rather than cat.

Prove the Statement was Made to Others

You can't file a civil lawsuit against an individual for slandering you to your face if no one else is around to hear it. The basis of a defamation of character claim is the supposition that the statement caused damage to your reputation, which isn't the case if no one else was privy to the statement. You must be able to demonstrate that someone else heard or read it to win.

In some cases, this will be easy enough to prove, especially in the event of libel. If the aforementioned restaurant critic published his review in the New York Times, it is safe to assume that hundreds of thousands of people read it. However, if the review never made it to the paper, you'll have a hard time winning your case.

Prove the Statement Caused You Harm

The next facet you'll need to cover in your civil lawsuit is harm. In order to prove libel or slander, you must be able to demonstrate beyond a reasonable doubt that the written or spoken statement damaged your reputation. For example, if the critic published his defamatory review, you could use the fact that sales decreased 40% over the next week as proof of harm.

Contrary to popular opinion, however, the harm must be more than circumstantial. Losing a job or customers, being assaulted on the street, receiving hate mail from angry readers or getting demoted at work are all examples of harm, which can definitely help to prove libel or slander

you post all this shit then call it slander! what a feakin joke. running scared huh?

Slander? You wish toots...

In the grand scheme of things no one gives a flying f---

OSBORN SPOTTED AT MCDONALDS USING THEIR FREE WIFI AFTER A RECENT EVICTION POSTING HER USUAL RHETORIC ON LEO AFFAIRS AND OTHER COP HATING WEBSITES.