Results 131 to 137 of 137
-
08-25-2012, 03:38 PM #131
Re: IN COLD BLOOD
Originally Posted by jus maybe
-
08-26-2012, 04:01 AM #132
Re: IN COLD BLOOD
"Martin maintains the allegations are not true, and despite the sworn testimony, the Internal Affairs could not substantiate those allegations. However, Martin did receive more than a two week unpaid suspension for associating with a known drug user and violating the law enforcement code of ethics."
Wasn't there a female deputy that was caught dating a felon she met during an investigation a while back? Two weeks sounds like a decent punishment to me. What did the female deputy get?
-
08-28-2012, 02:41 PM #133
Re: IN COLD BLOOD
Originally Posted by Remindme
2011 Florida Statutes
Title XLVI
CRIMES Chapter 838
BRIBERY; MISUSE OF PUBLIC OFFICE View Entire Chapter
838.022?Official misconduct.—
(1)?It is unlawful for a public servant, with corrupt intent to obtain a benefit for any person or to cause harm to another, to:
(a)?Falsify, or cause another person to falsify, any official record or official document;
(b)?Conceal, cover up, destroy, mutilate, or alter any official record or official document or cause another person to perform such an act; or
(c)?Obstruct, delay, or prevent the communication of information relating to the commission of a felony that directly involves or affects the public agency or public entity served by the public servant.
(2)?For the purposes of this section:
(a)?The term “public servant” does not include a candidate who does not otherwise qualify as a public servant.
(b)?An official record or official document includes only public records.
(3)?Any person who violates this section commits a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
-
10-08-2012, 05:57 PM #134
Re: IN COLD BLOOD
Wow, this was one of the longest running threads recently. Too bad it slowwed down. I guess with pricks like MP and LA losing their chance to mark out for their golden gloves champion who got KO'd by the new kid. Too bad. In cold blood describes these two snakes in the grass. They talk tough. They even talk like old school cops. In reality they turned out to be snakes. But that does imply they have spines. Maybe jellyfish is a better term. Funny how two people who have so many skeletons in their own closets have the balls to point out a single rib bone on others. Come on, where's SERPICO and all the other BS defenders at now?
-
01-09-2013, 03:06 AM #135
Re: IN COLD BLOOD
Originally Posted by Ding Ding
-
01-09-2013, 06:47 AM #136
Re: IN COLD BLOOD
[quote=Ding Dong]
Originally Posted by "Ding Ding":2w3hyr09
Well, no one has lost (past tense for lose) anything yet. Except maybe a few jobs. But the guys who have resigned have nothing, they are gone, they have no appeal. The guys who got fired can appeal, which they may have or have not done, but there are no guarantees in life or the law. People have been ranting for years about the inequities of IA's and nothing has changed much. So what makes you think alot will change now? Is big bad Ken Afienko on the case now? We all know what a stellar attorney his is not. Did they hire some big wig with their security guard pay to represent them in the DOAH hearing perhaps? Who knows. But really, is the sheriff going to get an ulcer over what some panty waste posts on Leoaffairs.com? I'm pretty sure not so much as a small burp. So good luck casting the caber into the yard or the shit into the fan. Whatever, it all smells about the same.
-
01-10-2013, 03:36 AM #137
Re: IN COLD BLOOD
[quote=You Dumm Dumm][quote="Ding Dong":3sgn5rk8]
Originally Posted by "Ding Ding":3sgn5rk8
Well, no one has lost (past tense for lose) anything yet. Except maybe a few jobs. But the guys who have resigned have nothing, they are gone, they have no appeal. The guys who got fired can appeal, which they may have or have not done, but there are no guarantees in life or the law. People have been ranting for years about the inequities of IA's and nothing has changed much. So what makes you think alot will change now? Is big bad Ken Afienko on the case now? We all know what a stellar attorney his is not. Did they hire some big wig with their security guard pay to represent them in the DOAH hearing perhaps? Who knows. But really, is the sheriff going to get an ulcer over what some panty waste posts on Leoaffairs.com? I'm pretty sure not so much as a small burp. So good luck casting the caber into the yard or the shit into the fan. Whatever, it all smells about the same.[/quote:3sgn5rk8]
Wow up late r we? Tying one on? Look, since you're mentioning panties why don't u try to wiggle out of your granny panties and shove them down your cakehole since it's big enuff to swallow all of that gross nylon.
Bookmarks