PRUMMELL FOR SHERIFF

[Mod 610]

Rubino is at 37,500 so, how is Pope 2nd at 21,300? From going over it, it appears that Cameron returned all his money and it was given back to Prumell.

Yea BC's bait and switch campaign fund raising really paid off for BP. BC collected the money up front and then so graciously backed out of the election encouraging his supporters to transfer their donations to BP. Nicely played. But what else would we expect from him after four years.

Rubino is at 37,500 so, how is Pope 2nd at 21,300? From going over it, it appears that Cameron returned all his money and it was given back to Prumell.

Not all of it. Chris Evans, Laishley, and Treworgy went with Sapp. Pretty much all the good ole boys.

Rubino is at 37,500 so, how is Pope 2nd at 21,300? From going over it, it appears that Cameron returned all his money and it was given back to Prumell.

Not all of it. Chris Evans, Laishley, and Treworgy went with Sapp. Pretty much all the good ole boys.

What the one that posted originally about the reported donations failed to realize is that the candidates had until yesterday friday the 13thto report in. Do you really think Sapp with all his big money supporters only raised a little over 6grand? He's waiting till the last to report in. He wants to see everyone else's hand first. He's playing this thing smart. These reports have a psychological effect not only on the other candidates, but on the voting public. A big number indicates support and people like siding with the winning side. I have a feeling Sapp's numbers will blow the rest of them out of the water.

[quote=Of course]

Rubino is at 37,500 so, how is Pope 2nd at 21,300? From going over it, it appears that Cameron returned all his money and it was given back to Prumell.

Not all of it. Chris Evans, Laishley, and Treworgy went with Sapp. Pretty much all the good ole boys.

What the one that posted originally about the reported donations failed to realize is that the candidates had until yesterday friday the 13thto report in. Do you really think Sapp with all his big money supporters only raised a little over 6grand? He's waiting till the last to report in. He wants to see everyone else's hand first. He's playing this thing smart. These reports have a psychological effect not only on the other candidates, but on the voting public. A big number indicates support and people like siding with the winning side. I have a feeling Sapp's numbers will blow the rest of them out of the water.[/quote:2yp0hg6k]

"Sapp's numbers will blow the rest of them out of the water"

5 Reasons why NOT to vote for Prummell!

1. BC has decided to appeal to the Governor about the $3,000,000 that the County Commission wants him to cut from his 2011-2012 Budget. Even though BP has publicly stated that he feels that it is wrong to do so, if elected, has pledged his total support to BC, in the process.

2. Look for Colonel DB to retire, in August, and for Major DL to be appointed Colonel,(Chief Deputy). LORD FORBID! BP has also given his full support to that promotion. This would most probably be an indication of what Deputies would be in store for, under BP.

3. Remember when BP was put in charge of IA? The complete end of the hallway, where his office was located was put "Off Limits" to all personnel. This is also a good indicator of what kind of accessibility and transperency a BP administration would have.

4. In a last ditch effort, BC has published a very false and distorted accessment of all of BP's opponents. The word is that JD will also publish one soon. BP had first-hand knowledge of all of this, and supports the effort. This is also a good indicator that BP would continue BC's dirty-tricks politics, and continue to use the Office for his personal gain.

5. BP cannot handle money, and has filed a Personal Bankruptcy, in the past.

[Stealth?]

5 Reasons why NOT to vote for Prummell!

1. BC has decided to appeal to the Governor about the $3,000,000 that the County Commission wants him to cut from his 2011-2012 Budget. Even though BP has publicly stated that he feels that it is wrong to do so, if elected, has pledged his total support to BC, in the process.

2. Look for Colonel DB to retire, in August, and for Major DL to be appointed Colonel,(Chief Deputy). LORD FORBID! BP has also given his full support to that promotion. This would most probably be an indication of what Deputies would be in store for, under BP.

3. Remember when BP was put in charge of IA? The complete end of the hallway, where his office was located was put "Off Limits" to all personnel. This is also a good indicator of what kind of accessibility and transperency a BP administration would have.

4. In a last ditch effort, BC has published a very false and distorted accessment of all of BP's opponents. The word is that JD will also publish one soon. BP had first-hand knowledge of all of this, and supports the effort. This is also a good indicator that BP would continue BC's dirty-tricks politics, and continue to use the Office for his personal gain.

5. BP cannot handle money, and has filed a Personal Bankruptcy, in the past.

1. Seeing that the budget needs to finalized long before BP takes office his approval isn't needed. As far as getting the funds if you understood how the budget works you'd know that the CCSO is supposed to be able to have the funds its asking for. Then again maybe you like working short staff and without equipment.

2. Everybody knows that the Colonel is retiring and so is DL. MC has also said he's thinking of retiring.I don't know why you guys have such fear of DL.

3.IA should be and is in most agencies off limits. To be able to do what the do they need a level of autonomy, If you'd worked for an agency you'd know this.

4. While I can't comment on all of it I can tell you from personal knowledge of having been there when it happened that BC's editorial was dead on. I understand he reviewed documents for weeks making sure he could back up everything he stated. He also did it without BP's knowledge.

5. BP's bankruptcy was back in the early 90's and he has since taken classes on finance, worked on the CCSO budget, and has never had a problem with his persal finances since. Sounds like that unlike others he learned from his mistakes.

[quote=Stealth?]

5 Reasons why NOT to vote for Prummell!

1. BC has decided to appeal to the Governor about the $3,000,000 that the County Commission wants him to cut from his 2011-2012 Budget. Even though BP has publicly stated that he feels that it is wrong to do so, if elected, has pledged his total support to BC, in the process.

2. Look for Colonel DB to retire, in August, and for Major DL to be appointed Colonel,(Chief Deputy). LORD FORBID! BP has also given his full support to that promotion. This would most probably be an indication of what Deputies would be in store for, under BP.

3. Remember when BP was put in charge of IA? The complete end of the hallway, where his office was located was put "Off Limits" to all personnel. This is also a good indicator of what kind of accessibility and transperency a BP administration would have.

4. In a last ditch effort, BC has published a very false and distorted accessment of all of BP's opponents. The word is that JD will also publish one soon. BP had first-hand knowledge of all of this, and supports the effort. This is also a good indicator that BP would continue BC's dirty-tricks politics, and continue to use the Office for his personal gain.

5. BP cannot handle money, and has filed a Personal Bankruptcy, in the past.

1. Seeing that the budget needs to finalized long before BP takes office his approval isn't needed. As far as getting the funds if you understood how the budget works you'd know that the CCSO is supposed to be able to have the funds its asking for. Then again maybe you like working short staff and without equipment.

2. Everybody knows that the Colonel is retiring and so is DL. MC has also said he's thinking of retiring.I don't know why you guys have such fear of DL.

3.IA should be and is in most agencies off limits. To be able to do what the do they need a level of autonomy, If you'd worked for an agency you'd know this.

4. While I can't comment on all of it I can tell you from personal knowledge of having been there when it happened that BC's editorial was dead on. I understand he reviewed documents for weeks making sure he could back up everything he stated. He also did it without BP's knowledge.

5. BP's bankruptcy was back in the early 90's and he has since taken classes on finance, worked on the CCSO budget, and has never had a problem with his persal finances since. Sounds like that unlike others he learned from his mistakes.[/quote:9no65366]

Looks like Prummell got him a mouth piece. But all you have is excuses. No one wants excuses they want facts. No one cares what you think. And no one likes a supporter of DL. Three strikes your ass is out.

[Stealth?]

Well if you want to call facts excuses you're living in a sad world. If you like that lets see what happens when I dig up the posts with proof of Ed's DVI's and failure to complete FTO information. We'll see who is making the excuses then.

I just got around to seeing the paper showing BP on the front page giving out a certificate to an inmate at the jail. Was there no one else available who actually works in the jail say a major or a captain for this photo op? Or maybe the jail employee who oversaw this program and did all of the work? Looks like another bit of free campaign advertisement compliments of admin. I'm sure I'm not the only one who thought this especially since his title is captain over west road patrol. He must have just been in the neighborhood huh. How convenient.