Results 1 to 10 of 38
-
03-04-2012, 05:19 PM #1
new assistant chief
It appears Frank Fernandez is coming on as AC
-
03-05-2012, 06:06 PM #2
Re: new assistant chief
Originally Posted by Guest
From Miami PD?
-
03-05-2012, 08:32 PM #3
Re: new assistant chief
here we go again with the same stupid BS, your info is rubbish!
-
03-07-2012, 01:26 PM #4
Re: new assistant chief
FF is waiting to see if he is selected as chief at Miami Beach. If he isnt chosen then he is AC and eventually chief once Wiener returns from the reserves and is fired.
-
04-05-2012, 03:31 AM #5
Re: new assistant chief
Okay, Miami Beach did not select Frank Fernandez! So what's the AC's search status?
-
04-05-2012, 07:05 PM #6
Re: new assistant chief
Originally Posted by Mordant
-
04-07-2012, 10:05 PM #7
Re: new assistant chief
Naue, Naue, Naue!!!!!!!
-
04-11-2012, 12:05 PM #8
Re: new assistant chief
Originally Posted by Mordant
BEACUSE HE IS A COO COO BIRD
Deputy Police Chief Frank Fernandez said officers might, for example, surround a bank building, check the IDs of everyone going in and out and hand out leaflets about terror threats.<> "This is an in-your-face type of strategy. It's letting the terrorists know we are out there," Fernandez said. The operations will keep terrorists off guard, Fernandez said. He said al-Qaida and other terrorist groups plot attacks by putting places under surveillance and watching for flaws and patterns in security. < style="font-family: times new roman;"> "People are definitely going to notice it," Fernandez said. "We want that shock. We want that awe. But at the same time, we don't want people to feel their rights are being threatened. We need them to be our eyes and ears."
Deputy Police Chief Frank Fernandez is a fool who should be removed from his job as well as the Mayor and any member of the Miami City Council who approved this BS. First: There is no legal authority for coppers to demand anyone entering or leaving a bank, hotel or other public places "show their papers." The courts have consistently upheld the absolute right of Americans to travel freely without interference or harassment and walking is traveling, just like riding a horse or driving a car.
Walking into or exiting a hotel, bank or "other public places" is a fundamental right and an action freely chosen by an individual; it is not a mandated activity by any federal, state or local law, ordinance or statute. Free Americans have a constitutional right to travel which is protected by the U.S. Constitution; seeCrandall v. Nevada, 73 U.S. (6 Wall.) 35, 49 (1868)("We are all citizens of the United States, and as members of the same community must have the right to pass and repass through every part of it without interruption, as freely as in our own states");Kent v. Dulles, 357 U.S. 116, 125, 78 S.Ct. 1113, 1118 (1958)("The right to travel is a part of the 'liberty' of which the citizen cannot be deprived without the due process of law under the Fifth Amendment");United States v. Guest, 383 U.S. 745, 757, 86 S.Ct. 1170, 1178 (1966)("The constitutional right to travel from one State to another, and necessarily to use the highways and other instrumentalities of interstate commerce in doing so, occupies a position fundamental to the concept of our Federal Union"); Shapiro v. Thompson, 394 U.S. 618, 629, 89 S.Ct. 1322, 1329 (1969)("This Court long ago recognized that the nature of our Federal Union and our constitutional concepts of personal liberty unite to require that all citizens be free to travel throughout the length and breadth of our land uninhibited by statutes, rules or regulations which unreasonably burden or restrict this movement")Dunn v. Blumstein, 405 U.S. 330, 339, 92 S.Ct. 995, 1001 (1972)("....since the right to travel was a constitutionally protected right, 'any classification which serves to penalize the exercise of that right unless shown to be necessary to promote a compelling governmental interest, is unconstitutional'");(The Court in Dunn also declared that "The right to travel is an 'unconditional personal right, ' a right whose exercise may not be conditioned.'" Id, at 341); andMemorial Hospital v. Maricopa County, 415 U.S. 250, 254, 94 S.Ct. 1076, 1080(1974)("The right of interstate travel has repeatedly been recognized as a basic constitutional freedom").
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/policestate.htm
Guest
-
04-12-2012, 07:11 PM #9
Re: new assistant chief
Please don’t be too harsh on former Miami Police deputy chief Frank Fernandez, at the time of these ludicrous comments, he was under John F-ing Timoney’s influence! Deride him though for being such an intolerable “martinet”!
-
04-16-2012, 05:20 PM #10
Re: new assistant chief
Does CGPD have a Chief of Police or an Assistant Chief?
As for Fernandez and the operations described above, they were all his idea. Timoney was wrong for reigning the boy wonder
Bookmarks