mike priest not guilty - Page 3
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 31
 
  1. #21
    Guest

    Re: mike priest not guilty

    The board was Lt Forte, Lt Selina Barnes, Sgt Barber, Dep Harris, and Dep Baxter. The final vote was for 30 days off by a vote of 3/2. Lt Forte and Lt Barnes voted for termination while Sgt Barber, Dep Harris, and Dep Baxter voted for 30 days off. Before the final vote there was a MOTION for 2 weeks off that failed to get a second. If you weren't in there you don't know what was said-unless you are a staff member who was there merely to try to intimidate the board. Harris and Barber are PBA board members. Now they face possible retaliation. Instead of complaining why don't you sit on a board and see what goes on. Then you can worry about how they will get you back for having a voice and an opinion. Dont see alot of people volunteering for that now do we?

  2. #22
    Guest

    Re: mike priest not guilty

    Theyve been reported-nothing done-so there...start at the source of the prob-those in charge of the coverups-there are many more

  3. #23
    Guest

    Re: mike priest not guilty

    Quote Originally Posted by Guest
    Theyve been reported-nothing done-so there...start at the source of the prob-those in charge of the coverups-there are many more
    Then report them here, instead of your usual allusions, elisions and non-specific smears. Over and over you gutless wonders have been challenged to do so, yet not one of you has ever stepped up and done so. The closest any of you has ever come is ..."Well, I heard from somebody who heard from somebody else, who heard from somebody that they thought they saw..."

    Not many coverups will be uncovered from the front seat of a patrol car or the coffee counter at Tom Thumb....

  4. #24
    Guest

    Re: mike priest not guilty

    If you actually worked at the SO you would know what is true and what was covered up not that any of it matters today.

    Cue the ged insults....

  5. #25
    Guest

    Talking Re: mike priest not guilty

    doesn't really matter...when CJSTC gets the disciplinary report he's DONE! They will pull his standards. On duty, off duty; he was in uniform in the position of authority. His bad decision will be his undoing.

  6. #26
    Guest

    Re: mike priest not guilty

    Well you should probably do some research. CJSTC rules allow for the investigating agency to submit a letter stating that the internal is concluded and what disciplinary action was taken. They will then close the the case as resolved by the agency.

  7. #27
    Guest

    Re: mike priest not guilty

    Your Fired Waterboy!!! :devil: :devil: :devil:

  8. #28
    Guest

    Re: mike priest not guilty

    Quote Originally Posted by waterboy
    Your Fired Waterboy!!! :devil: :devil: :devil:
    He won't be fired.

  9. #29
    Guest

    Re: mike priest not guilty

    Quote Originally Posted by Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by waterboy
    Your Fired Waterboy!!! :devil: :devil: :devil:
    He won't be fired.
    He won't? Goes to show how much you know. He was terminated today.

  10. #30
    Guest

    Re: mike priest not guilty

    I heard if you report things here they delete them-must be true since some of the other posts were removed about the voting.

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •