Results 21 to 30 of 39
-
04-14-2011, 03:02 PM #21
Re: Polk Jury blasts PCSO for flubbed investigation
You need to re read the post above yours, it states the jurors can't have it both ways, either enforce the law all the time, or not at all. we dont get to pick and choose when we enforce it. The only reason anyone is making a big issue out of this, is the summary judgment. Otherwise, it would have gone unnoiticed, as hundreds of cases a day do. And remember, civil trial requires a lot less preponderarnce of evidence for judgment that in criminal court. And hopefully the insurance company has a deep pocket or it is all in vain anyway. And I would like to know your reason for even posting all of this negativity anyway. What's in it for you?
-
04-14-2011, 06:46 PM #22
Re: Polk Jury blasts PCSO for flubbed investigation
Originally Posted by Guest
Maybe because your Sheriff thinks he can take our budget and run FHP out of Polk County. This is a nice way to show the citizens that the PCSO is not so perfect.
-
04-14-2011, 06:49 PM #23
Re: Polk Jury blasts PCSO for flubbed investigation
Originally Posted by Guest
What the HELL are you talking about? Summary Judgment, have it both ways, Vain - a family lost their son and the SO did not even issue a citation. U guys are unbelievable!!!!
-
04-14-2011, 07:21 PM #24
Re: Polk Jury blasts PCSO for flubbed investigation
screw fhp we don't need no triple a with a badge anyway dissolve them all and make them sheriffs service officers they would probably get a pay raise! troopers don't make nothing cause they don't do nothing if they they still insist on working for the state, make them road rangers!!!
-
04-14-2011, 07:30 PM #25
Re: Polk Jury blasts PCSO for flubbed investigation
troopers hard at work- i have seen them eight patrol cars deep parked behind perkins in bartow on a sunday morning...yet they want to dump all the crashes they can on pcso.
typical dispatch for the s.o. "fhp wants to know if we can work a crash at..." or "fhp has no one to go". wouldnt want them to miss breakfast.
-
04-15-2011, 07:45 AM #26
Re: Polk Jury blasts PCSO for flubbed investigation
First you say this is total b.S. and that someone is taking shots at the SO. Now, that it appears that the post was true - you are taking shot at other depts. Instead of throwing dirt, investigate this incident and if charges are warranted make them. If not, explain to the family why not. Do not ignore this family as your dept has for the last 5 years.
If I wanted to get really dirty I will get copies of all the depos taken from the attys and post them. Trust me, you would be embarrassed to find out that: 1. the THI deputy and his supervisors did not know that the blood was sent by a detective to get analysed by a toxicologist. 2. not even a ticket for being in the wrong lane was issued. There are a lot of unanswered questions...
Judd is a good leader and your dept is top notch! Act like it and do the Right Thing.
-
04-15-2011, 08:50 AM #27
Re: Polk Jury blasts PCSO for flubbed investigation
No where in this whole thread do I see where anyone made contact with the Sheriff.
According to the idiot who posted all of this, all the family / attorney did was call a few times and spoke to a records clerk or a desk officer.
There is no mention of anyone going to the Sheriff's Office to speak to anyone in Administration. If it were my family, I would have sat in the lobby until the Sheriff would see me.
Unless you work for PCSO, you don't know what was done with the investigation. According to the Original poster:
So, here is the rumor:
A friend who works at the courthouse just told my wife that a civil trial for a wrongful death action had just finished
Yes, that is what is so terrible about this. Mother drove up on scene and identified son there. After that, no contact. Her attorney who I know personally made several calls and was told S-7 still under investigation and would not comment
I did check with a baliff who works at the courthouse and last week there was a large verdict in excess of 7 million and the jury did make a Public Statement regarding the Polk SO
To quash all the rumors I asked the bailiff and he told me the law firm was Burnetti, PA - on their web site is the following story....
As for Sheriff Judd, he is beyond reproach. If a Deputy dropped the ball, and he is made aware of it, he will correct the problem. The PCSO has no problem putting criminals in jail or administering justice in a number of ways.
The Family and/or Attorney need to go to the PCSO if they have a problem, and address it the proper way.
Stirring up crap on a website is not the proper way to file a complaint with a Law Enforcement Agency. I doubt PCSO has anyone moniter this website for complaints. Most of the crap posted on here is BS that no one pays attention to anyway.
-
04-15-2011, 09:07 AM #28
Re: Polk Jury blasts PCSO for flubbed investigation
So many holes in this story, so little space.
the THI deputy and his supervisors did not know that the blood was sent by a detective to get analysed by a toxicologist
Where would a detective get a blood sample from? Hospitals don't keep them after they do their medically needed tests, they dispose of them. A subpeona would only get records of the tests the hospital performed.
Why would a detective send off a blood sample (assuming he was somehow able to get one) to a lab without ever notifying the Investigating Deputy and/or his Supervisor?
Why wouldn't anyone notify the Deputy and/or Supervisor of the results once they did come back from the lab?
How could the Deputy be expected to file any charges if he was never informed of the results of the lab tests?
If he didn't get the lab results, how would the Deputy know the person had been using drugs?
There are more but why bother?
-
04-15-2011, 09:40 AM #29
Re: Polk Jury blasts PCSO for flubbed investigation
Originally Posted by Guest
-
04-15-2011, 09:52 AM #30
Re: Polk Jury blasts PCSO for flubbed investigation
http://www.burnetti.com/blog/view/la...llion-verdict/
No jury statement there.
Bookmarks