Results 11 to 20 of 48
-
02-04-2011, 05:43 AM #11
Re: Scott strikes again, Good Bye Protech
Originally Posted by Guest
It takes money to make money! I see 2 scenarios. Scott either had financial motivations were he could make more than 75 million in the long term by being governor by rewarding state contracts to companies who in turn would reward him down the road. But really I don't believe that. If I had his money, I would not run for governor and then deal with all the political ramblings of the politics and headaches involved. I could easily enjoy my life with that much money regardless of what political party was in power. That fact that he chose to run for governor spending records amount of money in order to win, is an indication he was motivated by his ego! That to me is a dangerous characteristic! And he is not an ubber genious either based upon his past conduct as a CEO. If he truly ran because he could truly make positive changes in Florida, spent 75 millions of his own money , that would also indicate he is extremely naive about the political process. It is early in his term, but I have little confidence in his ability! He is either corrupt, a psycho, or clueless!!!
-
02-05-2011, 12:27 AM #12
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- Posts
- 849
Re: Scott strikes again, Good Bye Protech
Hey, I'm no big Scott supporter and could care less who gets the Protech contract.
But, let's look at it:
Protech= Richard Nimer x-assistant secrectary of DOC who now is the PROTECH Vice President for Business Development ; Jenny Nimmer current head of Community Corrections who defacto oversees the PROTECH contract; x-Governor Martinez and his brother Alan now in the link, New Port Richie Senator Fesano. I wonder who the other "investors" are and I wonder what kind of support Martinez has given Fesano not to mention how much PROTECH has invested in the local races.
Yet none of this comes up in the article. I wonder why?
Keep the contract with a Florida company- PROTECH. Just get rid of the obvious conflicts of interest. Hell, PROTECH can hire Jenny Nimmer as Assistant Vice President for Business Development giving her six figures for for all I care. Just get her out of the probation business.
-
02-05-2011, 12:33 AM #13
Re: Scott strikes again, Good Bye Protech
Originally Posted by CPT Aubrey
:roll: We are about to get literally raped by the Governor and all you can do is keep posting over and over this stuff and that Citrus case where an offender (not an officer or supervisor or even a CO person) committed a crazy act.
-
02-05-2011, 12:36 AM #14
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- Posts
- 849
Re: Scott strikes again, Good Bye Protech
Ah, and if PROTECH loses the contract, that will help us with the raping Ergo we flame on Scott?
The Citrus stuff as you put it concerns us all as guys like Nimmer have continuually sold officer safety down the river.
I can only conclude you work for PROTECH or Nimmer.
-
02-05-2011, 12:41 AM #15
Re: Scott strikes again, Good Bye Protech
Originally Posted by CPT Aubrey
-
02-05-2011, 12:45 AM #16
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- Posts
- 849
Re: Scott strikes again, Good Bye Protech
We aren't getting that stuff because NO ONE has ever asked for it and given plausible reasons why we need it.
What has happened is that folks like Jenny Nimmer have dashboard dogged it their whole career letting the prison side of the house take resources meant for CC.
And when anyone like Grant tries to bring that up, it's the dashboard dogs that stab them in the back.
and that is how the game is played in Central Office.
-
02-05-2011, 12:49 AM #17
Re: Scott strikes again, Good Bye Protech
Originally Posted by CPT Aubrey
-
02-05-2011, 12:56 AM #18
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- Posts
- 849
Re: Scott strikes again, Good Bye Protech
You are so full of it. Grant was no more a back stabber of line officers than fly to the moon. He's the only guy I can remember who has gone out into the field and talked to line officers without any Central Office strap hangers.
First, I was there. He fought against any cuts to line staff. He fought against losing those 66 guys.
He stood up to the Secretary and fought against losing DCA positions because he knew of the quid pro quo between the union and the Secretary. They agreed not to cut any more line positions so that any future position loss would come from "middle management".
So what did they do? They got rid of the majority of DCA positions and DRD positions, then renamed the DRD positions with some off the wall title like Operations Manager and kept them all in place. Where did they get the money? From the DCA position loss and the empty CPO position loss.
It's a shell game. Grant knew it. I know it.
Wake up and smell the F_N coffee.
-
02-05-2011, 01:02 AM #19
Re: Scott strikes again, Good Bye Protech
Originally Posted by CPT Aubrey
-
02-05-2011, 01:23 AM #20
Lies and untruths
Originally Posted by Guest
I cry B.S. I was in one of those meetings and that wasn't said. Some people here are out of touch. The loss of the DCA positions meant a possible promotion avenue was lost for supervisors. What do the prisons have ? Lieutenants, Captains, Majors, Colonels, Assistant Wardens and Wardens. What do we have? Supervisors, Sup III's and Circuit Administrators.
Bookmarks