Another IA??

Someone tell me, is there truth to the rumor that there is yet a new IA against our favorite capatain?
He has to have the record at this point.

I heard the same thing but have not been able to independently verify it.

The rumor about the "waste water" leakage in his office is true though...how poetic. I guess it does all eventually run down hill.

Can anyone clear up the other one?

Doesnt matter if he has another IA or not. The command staff will circle the wagons again and not do a thing to him. Why even worry about this, the guy has zero respect from anyone - both below him and above him. If he wasnt a captain and wasnt so vindictive, no doubt many more people would tell him what they think of him. It is like Joe Yetto never left.
What does it matter?

Doesnt matter if he has another IA or not. The command staff will circle the wagons again and not do a thing to him. Why even worry about this, the guy has zero respect from anyone - both below him and above him. If he wasnt a captain and wasnt so vindictive, no doubt many more people would tell him what they think of him. It is like Joe Yetto never left.
What does it matter?

Scuds rain down from above...circling the wagons will do no good except make for a fatter, more easily recognizable, target.

[quote=Scuds...]

Doesnt matter if he has another IA or not. The command staff will circle the wagons again and not do a thing to him. Why even worry about this, the guy has zero respect from anyone - both below him and above him. If he wasnt a captain and wasnt so vindictive, no doubt many more people would tell him what they think of him. It is like Joe Yetto never left.
What does it matter?

Scuds rain down from above...circling the wagons will do no good except make for a fatter, more easily recognizable, target.[/quote:30a5ious]

The guy has gotten away with bs time and time again. What makes you think that this time is going to be any different? He is the one who has to live with the fact that nobody likes him.

Didn't take long for those last few posts to be removed.

Still doesn't change the fact they were true.

[MOD 1]

Didn't take long for those last few posts to be removed.

Still doesn't change the fact they were true.

They shouldn't last long when they violate the Terms of Use.

Mod 1

Didn't take long for those last few posts to be removed.

Still doesn't change the fact they were true.

They shouldn't last long when they violate the Terms of Use.

Mod 1

What was the violation of the Terms of Use? I couldn't find it in the text below. If we as the officers have a problem with the way a Captain is leading, or in this case, failing to lead, can we not voice our opinions about this? Or is MOD 1 the capt in question? That would make more sense. Let us speak!

Here's an opportunity to voice your opinion, ask questions, become more informed, make a stand or engage in a healthy debate.

Terms of Agreement:
You agree that you will not submit Messages to Forums that:

are unlawful, threatening, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, or indecent, including any communication that constitutes (or encourages conduct that would constitute) a criminal offense, gives rise to civil liability, or otherwise violates any local, state, national, or international law;
violate the copyright, trademark, or other intellectual property rights of any other person. By submitting Messages to Forums, you represent to LEOAFFAIRS.COM, LLC that you are the rightful owner of such material or that you have first obtained permission to submit the material from the rightful owner;
improperly assume or claim the identity, characteristics, or qualifications of another person;
are for purposes of spamming;
contain any virus or other harmful component;
are libelous, or an invasion of privacy or publicity rights or any other third party rights; or
are for commercial purposes or contain advertising or are intended to solicit a person to buy or sell services or to make donations.

[MOD 1]

It's amazing how you missed the paragraph right before that.

This is not a SLAM site and the Forums should be used constructively. Messages (anonymous or not) accusing anyone (including political candidates) of wrong doing (and/or criminal accusations) without substantial proof or reference are subject to deletion. Use your REAL name unless the need for an Anonymous Message is warranted. Messages not requiring Anonymous status, but being abused, are subject to deletion by System Moderators. Anonymous Messages are not granted the same right to exist that properly identified Messages are. Failure to comply can result in Message deletion and/or access blockage.

[quote="MOD 1"]It's amazing how you missed the paragraph right before that.

MOD 1, if you knew the person that was posting this it would make complete sense. He likes to skip/omit/change anything that could possibly point to him as the problem.