Results 91 to 95 of 95
-
04-15-2008, 09:18 PM #91
Re: charlie
[quote=TRUTH SHALL SET YOU FREE]
Originally Posted by "guest 101":11fa976a
ONCE AND FOR ALL CAN WE PUT THIS SUBJECT TO REST? THEY GOT RID OF CHARLIE BECAUSE (1) HE WAS NEVER QUALIFIED TO BE CHIEF OF POLICE HERE. HE COULDN'T EVEN SOLVE THE ONLY CASE THAT WAS EVER ASSIGNED TO HIM IN THE DB AFTER 30 YEARS OF POLICE EXPERIENCE. (2) PERHAPS MOST FATALLY TO HIM, HE NEVER KNEW THE TRIBE OR HOW THEY OPERATE, EVEN THOUGH THEIR BLOOD RUNS THROUGH HIS VEINS. HAD HE TAKEN THE TIME TO GET TO KNOW HIS PEOPLE DURING THE LAST HALF-CENTURY OF HIS LIFE, THEY WOULD HAVE ALLOWED HIM TO STAY, REGARDLESS OF HIS INEXPERIENCE OR LACK OF QUALIFICATIONS.
WHAT HAVE WE COME TO IN LAW ENFORCEMENT? WE NOW HONOR THOSE THAT DO THE RIGHT THING? ARE THERE SO MANY WHO DON'T DO THE RIGHT THING, WHERE DOING THE RIGHT THING IS NOW A RARE COMODITY? HE DID NOT FIRE THE OFFICERS BECAUSE THEY WERE JUSTIFIED IN DOING WHAT THEY DID. THEY SHOT A GUY WHO WAS TRYING TO KILL THEM. THEY HAD THE LEGAL AUTHORITY TO DO WHAT THEY DID AND EVERYONE IN THE WORLD, FDLE, BSO, AGREES WITH THE OFFICER'S DECISION. HE DID NOT FIRE THEM BECAUSE OF THAT. HE WOULD HAVE BEEN A TRULY EVIL PERSON HAD HE FIRED THEM EVEN THOUGH THEY WERE JUSTIFIED BUT THE FACT HE IS TRULY NOT EVIL DOESNT MAKE HIM HONORABLE.
THE FACT THAT REMAINS AFTER ALL THE SMOKE HAS CLEARED IS THAT CHARLIE SIMPLY WAS NOT THE CANDIDATE THE TRIBE THOUGHT HE WAS.[/quote:11fa976a] GOOD POST AND TO THE POINT, VERY CLEAN.
-
05-07-2008, 05:26 AM #92
Re: charlie
[quote=guest 101][quote="TRUTH SHALL SET YOU FREE":3cx43wqb]
Originally Posted by "guest 101":3cx43wqb
ONCE AND FOR ALL CAN WE PUT THIS SUBJECT TO REST? THEY GOT RID OF CHARLIE BECAUSE (1) HE WAS NEVER QUALIFIED TO BE CHIEF OF POLICE HERE. HE COULDN'T EVEN SOLVE THE ONLY CASE THAT WAS EVER ASSIGNED TO HIM IN THE DB AFTER 30 YEARS OF POLICE EXPERIENCE. (2) PERHAPS MOST FATALLY TO HIM, HE NEVER KNEW THE TRIBE OR HOW THEY OPERATE, EVEN THOUGH THEIR BLOOD RUNS THROUGH HIS VEINS. HAD HE TAKEN THE TIME TO GET TO KNOW HIS PEOPLE DURING THE LAST HALF-CENTURY OF HIS LIFE, THEY WOULD HAVE ALLOWED HIM TO STAY, REGARDLESS OF HIS INEXPERIENCE OR LACK OF QUALIFICATIONS.
WHAT HAVE WE COME TO IN LAW ENFORCEMENT? WE NOW HONOR THOSE THAT DO THE RIGHT THING? ARE THERE SO MANY WHO DON'T DO THE RIGHT THING, WHERE DOING THE RIGHT THING IS NOW A RARE COMODITY? HE DID NOT FIRE THE OFFICERS BECAUSE THEY WERE JUSTIFIED IN DOING WHAT THEY DID. THEY SHOT A GUY WHO WAS TRYING TO KILL THEM. THEY HAD THE LEGAL AUTHORITY TO DO WHAT THEY DID AND EVERYONE IN THE WORLD, FDLE, BSO, AGREES WITH THE OFFICER'S DECISION. HE DID NOT FIRE THEM BECAUSE OF THAT. HE WOULD HAVE BEEN A TRULY EVIL PERSON HAD HE FIRED THEM EVEN THOUGH THEY WERE JUSTIFIED BUT THE FACT HE IS TRULY NOT EVIL DOESNT MAKE HIM HONORABLE.
THE FACT THAT REMAINS AFTER ALL THE SMOKE HAS CLEARED IS THAT CHARLIE SIMPLY WAS NOT THE CANDIDATE THE TRIBE THOUGHT HE WAS.[/quote:3cx43wqb] GOOD POST AND TO THE POINT, VERY CLEAN.[/quote:3cx43wqb]I wish you cry babies in Imm. would shut the H#@@ up. You all have nothing to do but ***** about Chief Tiger and collect a BIG check for doing nothing. Charlie should have never been fired, instead, ALMOST everyone in Imm should have.
-
05-07-2008, 08:35 PM #93
Re: charlie
[quote=Anonymous][quote=guest 101]
Originally Posted by "TRUTH SHALL SET YOU FREE":3t9dmw29
Amen to that, and people will call themselves cops. Everyone of us in the beginning took an oath, What is that oath worth? Someone please tell me
-
05-10-2008, 05:09 PM #94
Re: charlie
[quote=guest11][quote=Anonymous]
Originally Posted by guest 101
Amen to that, and people will call themselves cops. Everyone of us in the beginning took an oath, What is that oath worth? Someone please tell me[/quote:3u3yzy0d]
When they come down here for details, they don't seem to be too happy. Carrying on a conversation is also seems to be out of the question.
-
05-10-2008, 05:11 PM #95
Re: charlie
[quote=guest11][quote=Anonymous]
Originally Posted by guest 101
Bookmarks