Positions - Page 2
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 24
 

Thread: Positions

  1. #11
    Guest
    SAVE ME A SPOT I HATE NPPD , SEE YA SOON.

  2. #12
    Guest
    dont blame ya elmo n port would be boring.

  3. #13
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by NPPD ELMO
    SAVE ME A SPOT I HATE NPPD , SEE YA SOON.
    a few years ago NPPD was the best place ever? what happend, hiring all those people without a poly finally catching up?

  4. #14
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Anonymous
    Quote Originally Posted by NPPD ELMO
    SAVE ME A SPOT I HATE NPPD , SEE YA SOON.
    a few years ago NPPD was the best place ever? what happend, hiring all those people without a poly finally catching up?
    NPPD doesn't require a poly???? Is that how Chief Terry Lewis got hired? :snicker:

  5. #15
    Guest
    let me tell you if your young nppd is not the best place to start out, i know. the future at nppd is up in the air, no one knows whats going to happen. it would not surprise me if sso took us over in 5yrs.

  6. #16
    Guest
    true 2 dat n port has lots of land but not a lot of action to fill all of that land. 90 percent of the land is not developed. a very small area is developed and still not a lot going on. of course scum bags are down there but not a lot of business or other industry to attract more crime and action for a young new leo.

  7. #17
    Guest

    Re: JOBS

    COME ON DOWN THIS IS THE BEST DEPARTMENT IN FLORIDA BAR NONE.

    BEST EQUIPMENT, BEST PEOPLE, AND WE DO HAVE MOVEMENT GOING ON IN THE FUTURE.

    Are u trying to lure him in with fake bait?????????????????????????Oh, and the movement . . .it goes like this: from patrol, to CID, to patrol. That kind of movement will make your head spin!! :lol:

  8. #18
    Guest
    Unfortunately the above reply has become a reality at SPD. The opportunities that young patrol officers used to have access to as few as 5-8 years ago have become almost nonexistent. NET and CRT are now only active units on paper with NET having only a few officers assigned and CRT having roughly 5 officers. Those units were designed originally to make a large impact in the overall crime levels in the projects and areas most vulnerable to street crime (aka HOT SPOTS). They are now reassigned so often that their original tasks have become more of an afterthought than a mission. As far as Patrol to CID and back to Patrol is concerned I would also have to agree.

    Both units have their respective benefits. That being said Patrol has the best job at SPD, the best pay, more time off, and a relatively low level of responsibility within the department (when your shift is done you hit the road no matter what's going on). All of the above factors makes Patrol very attractive for officers, unfortunately that comes with the loss of very active and efficient Detectives who return to Patrol after getting sick of the constant demand for the "stats" to add up. Having to "account for our existence" gets old after a few years. And why put up with that if you can make more cash and have less work? Both Patrol & CID are understaffed meaning more work for fewer people. Unfortunately the pressure to do more with less (although the Chief said that those days were over) are alive and well. Come the 29th of January if Amendment 1 passes we will be back the on chopping block having to defend ourselves from City Hall once again.

    The sad part about the entire situation is that most of the Officers at SPD are great people and good employees who if they were given the opportunity to excel they would with very little effort. Currently we do not have a program in place to allow Officers to gain experience to reach that level. SPD is full of great Officers, the system of administration needs to be changed to allow the best to excel and those that need remediation to obtaining the training that they need to become more productive without making them into bitter employees.

    We all have a hand in how the agency is run and we all need to be more vocal about the issues that need to be adressed and less willing to accept our short comings, they can be fixed but only if we take care of them. SPD is a good agency with great employees overall, but with minor changes in policy we can be a great police department.

  9. #19
    Guest
    I totally agree with the above post and couldn't have said it better. However, if the tax amendment passes, then you'll law enforcement scaled back to the bare essentials that we had in the 1950s:
    1. patrol (can't get rid of it)
    2. traffic (can't get rid of it)
    3. detective bureau (can't get rid of it)

    Everything else might be jettisoned. It would hurt the taxpayers to get rid of all the "specialized LE functions," but if the tax amendment passes, that's my prediction.

  10. #20
    Guest
    With budget cuts I doubt that they are going to hire anyone. They talking about more cuts so stay away unless you don't care to get hired and then let go.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •