Your soon to be new chief - Page 2
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 13 of 13
 
  1. #11
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Anonymous
    Quote Originally Posted by Anonymous
    Good, glad you made your peace! Now stay off our forum and go hire your new sheriff!
    Gee, shuch hostility. Ease up there. Somebody's just trying to fill you guys in on what to look out for. If he's better that what you had then great. But a leopard usually dosen't change it's spots. Hasn't your city thought about a merger? Not that we like mergers either. You might want to take caution in your tone.
    Be Safe Brothers & Sisters.
    the chief is an appointed position by the city commission. What does coming on here and "warning" us on what to look for do? Seriously? Are we going to sit there and say "we dont want this chief because some anonymous person said a mean thing on leoaffairs.com?" Going to beg the commission to make him leave because what we "heard" in his past? Let's be real here. We like him, thats all that matters. If it ends up being a flake, then we deal with it then. But until then, he has done great things so far and we're not complaining.

    There will be no merger, never will be, stay safe.

  2. #12
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Anonymous
    Quote Originally Posted by Anonymous
    Quote Originally Posted by Anonymous
    Good, glad you made your peace! Now stay off our forum and go hire your new sheriff!
    Gee, shuch hostility. Ease up there. Somebody's just trying to fill you guys in on what to look out for. If he's better that what you had then great. But a leopard usually dosen't change it's spots. Hasn't your city thought about a merger? Not that we like mergers either. You might want to take caution in your tone.
    Be Safe Brothers & Sisters.
    the chief is an appointed position by the city commission. What does coming on here and "warning" us on what to look for do? Seriously? Are we going to sit there and say "we dont want this chief because some anonymous person said a mean thing on leoaffairs.com?" Going to beg the commission to make him leave because what we "heard" in his past? Let's be real here. We like him, thats all that matters. If it ends up being a flake, then we deal with it then. But until then, he has done great things so far and we're not complaining. There will be no merger, never will be, stay safe.
    Just trying to help bro. You'll see. Others have said the same thing.

    Guest
    Posted: 09/13/07 06:31:25 Post subject: John Brooks

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    I would let this thread die. Its very apparent that Sunrise does not take caution well. At the very least they were warned and later when they come on here crying, we shall have the last laugh.


    There will be no merger, never will be, stay safe.[/quote]

  3. #13
    Guest

    SUNRISE CHIEF

    FROM WHAT EVERYONE IS SAYING HE MUST BE ONE THAT ONLY LOOKS OUT FOR HIMSELF IF THATS THE CASE THEN ALL HE WILL BE IS A PUPPET FOR THE CITY COMMISSIONERS BECAUSE THEY HIRED HIM AND HE KNOWS THAT IF HE DOESNT DO WHAT THEY WANT THEN HE'LL BE THE NEXT ONE TO GO JUST LIKE BOYETT

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •