Results 11 to 20 of 21
-
09-07-2007, 11:14 AM #11Originally Posted by Guest 123456
1. More Money "No"
2. Liked by the Public "No"
3. Forced the Commisioners into more staff "No"
4. Put the county administrator is his place 'No'
5. Separated the agency "Yes", hey guys theres one!!
6. Better Medical "Coverage" "No"
7. Better Equipment "No"
8. Made the Budget process better & opened lines of communication "No"
9. Assisted in the reduction of budgeted money "Yes", hey here is another one
Remember, your actions, confrontations, and demeanor hurt all of us, just to make you few feel a little better
-
09-07-2007, 11:17 AM #12Originally Posted by Anonymous
-
09-07-2007, 11:21 AM #13
Re: Thumbs Down to the FOP
Originally Posted by Now for the REAL truth!
-
09-07-2007, 11:33 AM #14
Re: More TRUTH
Originally Posted by Anonymous
You are 100% "RIGHT" They have hurt the agency and all of its members. I have been here a long time, (several sheriff's) and the county administrator does the samething to ALL of the sheriff's. It was quite clear (thanks public access channel) that " the Sheriff" is the one who cares about law enforcement!!! The commissioners and the County Administrator / staff treated us just like a libraries or parks. Without us, their is no safety. Thanks "union" for your hard work hurting ALL OF US!!!! Yes, why don't YOU / FOP fund our GAP insurance???????
-
09-07-2007, 11:37 AM #15Originally Posted by Columbo
-
09-07-2007, 11:44 AM #16
Re: More of the TRUTH...
Originally Posted by Anonymous
-
09-07-2007, 11:47 AM #17Originally Posted by Guest 123456
-
09-07-2007, 01:59 PM #18
I believe that the last 6 posters,(GUEST NEW, NEW GUEST, OLD TIMER, GUEST 369, UNION 101, AND GUESTS) are 1 writer using many A.K.A.'S to have so many posts saying pretty much the same thing (bash the union, and sizzuck the sheriffs bizzalls) all in about a half hour of each other is the work of one, it is apparent that the sheriff doesn't have that many supporters, and the way to try to rally support is to attack the union, The union was voted on by the members because they wanted protection and felt that the sheriff did not know better than them what was best for them. You can try to blame the Union all you want for the sheriffs failure during the budget process this year, but then who is to blame for the sheriffs failure for the 2007 budget and who is to blame for the sheriffs budget for 2006, now lets ask about failure in 2005, 2004, 2003, 2002, there is one common denominator to be found today as in the past... CAN I HAVE A DRUM ROLL PLEASE.......... SHERIFF BOB WHITE !!! HE AND HIS ADVISORS ARE TO BLAME FOR THE BUDGET FAILURES DURING HIS TERM, I WILL CUT HIM JUST A LITTLE BIT OF SLACK THIS YEAR THOUGH BECAUSE THE COMMISSIONERS AND ADMINISTRATORS WERE FACING A MONEY SHORTAGE AND MADE EVERY OTHER COUNY OFFICE/MUNICIPALITY/DEPARTMENT CUT THEIR BUDGET, BUT THE SHERIFF THOUGHT THIS DIDN'T INCLUDE HIM. WHILE EVERY BODY ELSE WAS MADE TO CUT, HE ASKED FOR HIS BIGGEST BUDGET INCREASE EVER. HMMM... MAKES SENSE TO ME BASED ON HIS WAY OF THINKING.
as a member of this agency for over 20 years I think I am qualified to say enough is enough I / WE voted for the union because WE wanted a say about US and OUR future and WE wil STAND UNITED and TOGETHER so get over yourself we are not going away, try to work with us, that is what will make this agency better, working together
-
09-07-2007, 02:00 PM #19
I believe that the last 6 posters,(GUEST NEW, NEW GUEST, OLD TIMER, GUEST 369, UNION 101, AND GUESTS) are 1 writer using many A.K.A.'S to have so many posts saying pretty much the same thing (bash the union, and sizzuck the sheriffs bizzalls) all in about a half hour of each other is the work of one, it is apparent that the sheriff doesn't have that many supporters, and the way to try to rally support is to attack the union, The union was voted on by the members because they wanted protection and felt that the sheriff did not know better than them what was best for them. You can try to blame the Union all you want for the sheriffs failure during the budget process this year, but then who is to blame for the sheriffs failure for the 2007 budget and who is to blame for the sheriffs budget for 2006, now lets ask about failure in 2005, 2004, 2003, 2002, there is one common denominator to be found today as in the past... CAN I HAVE A DRUM ROLL PLEASE.......... SHERIFF BOB WHITE !!! HE AND HIS ADVISORS ARE TO BLAME FOR THE BUDGET FAILURES DURING HIS TERM, I WILL CUT HIM JUST A LITTLE BIT OF SLACK THIS YEAR THOUGH BECAUSE THE COMMISSIONERS AND ADMINISTRATORS WERE FACING A MONEY SHORTAGE AND MADE EVERY OTHER COUNY OFFICE/MUNICIPALITY/DEPARTMENT CUT THEIR BUDGET, BUT THE SHERIFF THOUGHT THIS DIDN'T INCLUDE HIM. WHILE EVERY BODY ELSE WAS MADE TO CUT, HE ASKED FOR HIS BIGGEST BUDGET INCREASE EVER. HMMM... MAKES SENSE TO ME BASED ON HIS WAY OF THINKING.
as a member of this agency for over 20 years I think I am qualified to say enough is enough I / WE voted for the union because WE wanted a say about US and OUR future and WE wil STAND UNITED and TOGETHER so get over yourself we are not going away, try to work with us, that is what will make this agency better, working together
-
09-08-2007, 07:30 PM #20
The union has done a lot for us? Yeah, right! If you think the county administrator is "pro" union, you are wrong! Ask the firefighters about that, if you think I'm wrong.
Bookmarks