Search:
Type: Posts; User: Mod 557
Search: Search took 0.02 seconds.
-
05-19-2011, 04:40 AM
Thread: How is this for a policy?
by Mod 557- Replies
- 27
- Views
- 4,091
Re: How is this for a policy?
The removed posts were slamming an identifiable person. Although names were not used, the references and descriptors easily identified the people being talked about. Hope this answers your...
-
03-31-2011, 11:58 AM
Thread: Flexing duty to work OT?
by Mod 557- Replies
- 10
- Views
- 2,102
Re: Flexing duty to work OT?
Patrol officers can also adjust work hours to accomodate OT. You just need your supervisor's approval and yes, it will depend on manpower. This policy was addressed back when Archer-Western OT was...
-
12-02-2010, 02:37 PM
Thread: Fop President?
by Mod 557- Replies
- 4
- Views
- 1,564
Re: Fop President?
Your post contained a slam against an identifiable person, that was why it was deleted, not because of your choice for FOP president.
-
10-14-2010, 01:00 PM
- Replies
- 8
- Views
- 1,473
Re: New System of Moderation - Monitors Wanted
D B Cooper,
First, thank you for posting a very well written posting of your concerns. You did not slam anyone and you articulated your point well without childish inuendo. Having said... -
Re: unhappy
The posts you mention were removed as they were a slam against an identifiable officer, violating the terms of use, not because of who they were about. A post can identify an officer as long as it...
-
08-11-2009, 03:21 PM
Thread: Mod 557 answering why
by Mod 557- Replies
- 10
- Views
- 2,152
Re: Mod 557 answering why
First, thank you all of the posters so far on this thread, for responding in a prudent manner. Like I said, nothing wrong with venting iniquities, just be careful not to violate the terms. Second,...
-
Re: 110th ave
I would just like to express my gratitude for your very kind comments. There were some comments added to this thread because a tiny brain wanted to shout ignorance across the entire board. We...
-
08-04-2009, 02:46 PM
Thread: Mod 557 answering why
by Mod 557- Replies
- 10
- Views
- 2,152
Mod 557 answering why
Contrary to what a certain poster wants all to believe, I am not trying to "censor" an issue with a selection process. By all means that is one of the reasons this web site is so popular. The...
-
06-02-2009, 03:55 PM
Thread: Deputy Arrested
by Mod 557- Replies
- 24
- Views
- 4,096
Re: Deputy Arrested
I have removed some of the postings in this thread, and the entire last thread due to the posters violating the terms of use. Please refrain from using names and other violations of the terms of use...
-
03-08-2009, 06:30 AM
- Replies
- 23
- Views
- 4,555
Re: PPPD officer arrested and tazed in alleged drunken brawl
My apologies group....I have been away from the forum for a few days. I have removed the abusive post.
-
01-21-2009, 01:59 PM
Thread: Removal of the last topic
by Mod 557- Replies
- 2
- Views
- 8,396
Sticky: Re: Removal of the last topic
The reason for removal was the incredible overflow of posts violating the terms of use. There is still another topic on the board that is discussing the same issue that so far is compliant with the...
-
01-21-2009, 01:50 PM
Thread: Removal of the last topic
by Mod 557- Replies
- 2
- Views
- 8,396
Sticky: Removal of the last topic
Ok all, I had to finally completely remove the last topic as it was turning into a slam session using names and violating the terms of use. Mod 1 even had to ban 2 posters. This topic can be...
-
11-17-2008, 03:01 PM
Thread: Beauty is in the eye
by Mod 557- Replies
- 11
- Views
- 2,389
Re: Beauty is in the eye
Patrons of LEO Affairs, please remember our terms of use and be mindful of your postings. If you make personal attacks, or accusations of a legal nature, your post will be removed and you could...
Results 1 to 13 of 26