Search Results - LEO Affairs Forums

Search:

Type: Posts; User: Mod 557

Search: Search took 0.00 seconds.

  1. Replies
    27
    Views
    3,954

    Re: How is this for a policy?

    The removed posts were slamming an identifiable person. Although names were not used, the references and descriptors easily identified the people being talked about. Hope this answers your...
  2. Replies
    10
    Views
    2,045

    Re: Flexing duty to work OT?

    Patrol officers can also adjust work hours to accomodate OT. You just need your supervisor's approval and yes, it will depend on manpower. This policy was addressed back when Archer-Western OT was...
  3. Thread: Fop President?

    by Mod 557
    Replies
    4
    Views
    1,552

    Re: Fop President?

    Your post contained a slam against an identifiable person, that was why it was deleted, not because of your choice for FOP president.
  4. Replies
    8
    Views
    1,469

    Re: New System of Moderation - Monitors Wanted

    D B Cooper,

    First, thank you for posting a very well written posting of your concerns. You did not slam anyone and you articulated your point well without childish inuendo. Having said...
  5. Thread: unhappy

    by Mod 557
    Replies
    46
    Views
    5,582

    Re: unhappy

    The posts you mention were removed as they were a slam against an identifiable officer, violating the terms of use, not because of who they were about. A post can identify an officer as long as it...
  6. Replies
    10
    Views
    2,136

    Re: Mod 557 answering why

    First, thank you all of the posters so far on this thread, for responding in a prudent manner. Like I said, nothing wrong with venting iniquities, just be careful not to violate the terms. Second,...
  7. Thread: 110th ave

    by Mod 557
    Replies
    9
    Views
    1,593

    Re: 110th ave

    I would just like to express my gratitude for your very kind comments. There were some comments added to this thread because a tiny brain wanted to shout ignorance across the entire board. We...
  8. Replies
    10
    Views
    2,136

    Mod 557 answering why

    Contrary to what a certain poster wants all to believe, I am not trying to "censor" an issue with a selection process. By all means that is one of the reasons this web site is so popular. The...
  9. Replies
    24
    Views
    4,004

    Re: Deputy Arrested

    I have removed some of the postings in this thread, and the entire last thread due to the posters violating the terms of use. Please refrain from using names and other violations of the terms of use...
  10. Re: PPPD officer arrested and tazed in alleged drunken brawl

    My apologies group....I have been away from the forum for a few days. I have removed the abusive post.
  11. Replies
    2
    Views
    8,168

    Sticky: Re: Removal of the last topic

    The reason for removal was the incredible overflow of posts violating the terms of use. There is still another topic on the board that is discussing the same issue that so far is compliant with the...
  12. Replies
    2
    Views
    8,168

    Sticky: Removal of the last topic

    Ok all, I had to finally completely remove the last topic as it was turning into a slam session using names and violating the terms of use. Mod 1 even had to ban 2 posters. This topic can be...
  13. Replies
    11
    Views
    2,353

    Re: Beauty is in the eye

    Patrons of LEO Affairs, please remember our terms of use and be mindful of your postings. If you make personal attacks, or accusations of a legal nature, your post will be removed and you could...
Results 1 to 13 of 26