Guess what asshole if it wasn’t for cops like me dips!ts like you would be up sh!ts creek without a paddle. So be careful what you wish for. If I ever decide to switch to the other side I would have a field day with cops like you in court.
Printable View
All these graduates of Google Law School!!
Hey Jeff can **u hurry up and get us s decent raise before the federal court decision .
**u should probably check out the court ruling regarding Jim Acosta's press badge incident and update **ur legal binder accordingly. Pay particular attention to the part where the judge only found in favor of Acosta because there was no prior rules laid out governing revocation of press passes. In the case of removing elected officials in Florida there are already written rules (State Law) regarding due process in this circumstance. Those rules are being followed. He gets his due process in front of the Senate.
Next **u'll be telling us that every arreat we make is a violation of the Constitution because arrestees are denied their freedoms without due process. I guess according to **u every time we seek to make an arrest we must first call a judge and jury to the scene to give the suspect due process.
If **u are an actual attorney can I know **ur name, if only so ai don't actually hire **u for anything.
I would guess the basis of the suit will that the removal was politically motivated and so **u can see where that’s going. The Senate is republican lol. That’s **ur idea of due process, perhaps **u should move to Russia.
God **u guys are dumb. Ok stay tuned. This isn’t over guys. **** not going to be that cut and dry.
First, there aren't any violations of "due process". However, the Executive Order states the cause of suspension to be "neglect of duty" and "incompentance". "Neglect of duty" as defined by the Florida Supreme Court effectively would require the consitutional offer to not be doing their job at all, such as a no show. Just because someone or some people believe the job isn't done to their satisfaction does not rise to the level of "neglect of duty" as so definded. "Incompenance" as defined by the Florida Supreme Court requires a "condition" that's "onset occured post election". "Incompentance" for the purposes of suspension/removal of a constitutional officer basically requires a serious pyshological condition to have developed post election.
Basically, Isreal was suspended under claims to which the facts do not fit.
This doesn't make it past the courts as the governor did not have the lawful basis to suspend in the first place.
Please notice I'm not advocating for or against Israel. I'm just stating the legal reality. I suspect Israel should be in circuit court shortly on an expedited basis. Two years ago Governor Scott issued an Exeuctive Order of suspension in Broward and it was overturned in 3 weeks from the filing.
Most in the legal community schooled on this process fully agree. The suspension was what it was....politically motivated to appease the Parkland families, NRA and its' membership.
DeSantis also claimed on the campaign trail he would have vetoed the post MSD gun lesislation. A state rep from the panhandle has filed legislation to repeal that legislation. Will DeSantis sign the repeal if it passses the legislature and then face the ire of the Parkland families or veto it and face the ire of the NRA and its' membership. Politics makes strange bed fellows but DeSantis will need to select whose bed he will ultimely select as he may end up without any support.
This story is far from over.
Let's see if we can avoid the nasty, childish and totally ignorant comments but rather initiate a conversation based on facts and the law; not emotion. Unfortunately, I doubt that will happen which is why we have the agency we have today.
Duh,duh,duh i aint did nuttin wrong.