Originally Posted by
Unregistered
1st - Hahahhahahahahhahahahah. I’d like to know who will sue them for killing the armed attempted murder suspect. Who would that be? And what reason would they have to sue? You have a guy who is known to be armed with a handgun and believed to have access to a rifle. He deliberately shot his wife and left her for dead. He was a clear and present danger to every person in the area, cops included. He didn’t live in a bullet proof home, why is he allowed to dig in and jeopardize the safety of others after commuting an attempted first degree murder?
2nd - What is the “commonly accepted” method for taking an armed attempted murder suspect into custody? Is that method to sit, wait and talk? What rule book says you have to wait him out? What case law says you have to wait him out? What state law says you have to wait? What rule or regulation is established by CJST in the matter? I guarantee there is a provision in Florida Law that says police officers shall enforce the law and are charged to move forward with the apprehension of criminals.
3rd - I find your description of the entry element to be offensive and your belief they “forced the shooting” to be disgusting and weak. If anybody forced the shooting the suspect did. They didn’t just arrive, breach and shoot. This occurred over hours of attempted negotiations. The suspect could have just as easily dropped the gun and gone to jail.
It’s clear what your view is. You can’t handle that a small PD SWAT team did what a SWAT team should do. They utilized special weapons and tactics to neutralize a would be murderer within the confines of the law. I pray you do t have a say in SWAT operations anywhere. Apparently the tac gear is window dressing for fake operators in your mind.
🖕🏼🖕🏼🖕🏼🤪🖕🏼🖕🏼🖕🏼🖕🏼🤪🖕🏼🖕🏼🖕🏼