Originally Posted by
Unregistered
As the commission head of Parkland Shooting Investigation, do you believe Peterson should have been criminally charged? Do you believe this should apply to others as well? This is no time to be shy, the entire Countrys Law Enforcement would like to hear your answer. Your a attorney, does Leo's have a duty to sacrifice themselves or not? Does your training unit "teach" scenarios where your deps are required to be killed for the greater good? Under Broward's policy does may and shall mean the same thing? Does setting up a perimeter order by a Captain have anything to do with the Broward deps inaction? Seems like inaction was widespread, almost like they were following a Superior's Orders? Are the new civilian employees at schools that are armed, subject to criminal charges if they dont act? Does this now mean if one of your dep's off duty encounters a armed robbery involving multiple armed subjects in a area crowded with civilians, must act, or be considered a coward and be criminally charged? Never a time when taking no action would be a safer alternative? Never been any training that instructs you to do just that? This new attitude towards making exceptions for officer safety not being the most important priority and defending it publicly, will lead to the public expecting you to get killed, and much harder to defend in the future on any dangerous calls, not just active shooters at schools.