leoaffairs.com

Guest wrote:

gsosbee wrote:Your statement as follows is an harassing threat and is unlawful under the laws of the state of Texas :
"... don't try to flee or elude the police. It would be wrong...... and could be fatal. I'm from the government...."

I therefore call on the moderator and the corrupt & incompetent police to investigate your illegal use of computers for harassment purposes. Also, as you are from the government, the Federal Communication Commission is also being notified of your sick mind and filthy tongue. Seek help and stop threatening this writer. Tell me your name and your department of government and I'm sure the doj would like to have a talk with you, little guy.
geral sosbee (956)536-0439

This is the high modernator. We have your computer's IP address and will contact you soon. We are monitoring the transmissions in and out of your residence to ensure your safety. Remember, we are the government and are herevto help you.

gsosbee wrote:Your statement as follows is an harassing threat and is unlawful under the laws of the state of Texas :
"... don't try to flee or elude the police. It would be wrong...... and could be fatal. I'm from the government...."

I therefore call on the moderator and the corrupt & incompetent police to investigate your illegal use of computers for harassment purposes. Also, as you are from the government, the Federal Communication Commission is also being notified of your sick mind and filthy tongue. Seek help and stop threatening this writer. Tell me your name and your department of government and I'm sure the doj would like to have a talk with you, little guy.
geral sosbee (956)536-0439

gsosbee wrote:'Be Wary' exactly reflects the low mentality of the incompetent, cowardly and corrupt *police of this nation as he is also a pathological liar and hate monger who engages in ad hominem assaults in order to avoid the real issues. Tell us your true name, little man and take credit for your violent & degenerate statements. The police have gone too far in their manipulation of the slovenly courts and the people have the right and the duty to protect their fundamental human and constitutional rights against the outrageous police killing campaign now underway across the US.
The next time you gun down a man fleeing from your *murderous gang, think less of the silly law cited above wherein you can put the subject away for life (in some cases) , and focus more on your participation in the unacceptable Totalitarian State that the police, fbi, cia, courts, etc. now force on the people..

Here are some links corresponding generally to 'Be Wary's' attempts to discredit:
http://www.sosbeevfbi.com/part19a-updatefo.html

http://barbarahartwell.blogspot.com/200 ... lower.html

http://www.sosbeevfbi.com/letterformthemed.html

http://www.sosbeevfbi.com/geralsosbeearmyf.html

http://www.sosbeevfbi.com/hightechassau.html

*
http://www.sosbeevfbi.com/statement.html

gsosbee wrote:I am anti assassins and I am anti 'their supporters' like you; tell us your name punky one; then, we can credit your great mind and brave heart. Come out of hiding.

Now, regarding the ill advised law of making the fleeing from police a felony: this is a grave mistake because fleeing from serial killers is reasonable under any circumstances. The cops are trained to kill and to bring great harm to anyone at anytime.

The new law may therefore offer the citizen a choice: flee and be charged with a felony, or fight and be charged with a felony.

In any ebent the role of the corrupt and homicidal police in our society is similar to the role of Mafia figures on the street and in theory no difference in their characters exist.
Until this simple truth is realized and the police are disarmed or removed from our streets, violence remains the order of the day, 365.geral sosbee


http://barbarahartwellvscia.blogspot.co ... -2010.html

http://sosbeevfbi.com/proclamation.html

gsosbee wrote:http://sosbeevfbi.ning.com/forum/topics/fbicia-police-have-a-simple?xg_source=activity
http://sosbeevfbi.ning.com/profiles/blo ... d-warriors
http://www.sosbeevfbi.com/governmentmustcr.html



The fbi/cia/police and their operatives have a simple message for the Target:
We Intend to....

http://www.sosbeevfbi.com/oliverwendallhol.html

Guest wrote:When did you ever charge someone who flees on foot from you with FLEEING??????? Didn't think so. Brush up on your statutes ROOK.

No escape wrote:

Average Joe wrote:

Guest wrote:I think AJ was musing about charging people with escape. I do not believe any of the Justices suggested charging people with escape for fleeing in a vehicle.

Was asking a serious question.

The courts have ruled that if one flees from you on foot and he knew he was going to be arrested then this person is escaping and can be charged as such. Why not the same with cars? i am not saying to do this all of the time, but if you need to keep the person in jail in order to by you time to complete your investigation than why not. They would be held with a no bond.

Just saying sometimes you need to be creative, but then I am sure you would have a very hard time finding a supervisor that would stick their neck out and sign the CRA.

No, you are confusing things. The fleeing on foot is just that... fleeing.

The justice clearly was talking about the hazards associated with automobiles in his ruling. "Risk of violence is inherent to vehicle flight," Kennedy said. "It is well known that when offenders use motor vehicles as their means of escape they create serious potential risks of physical injury to others." That is where the violent felony comes in.

You can't be creative with your charges where there is no Florida Statute to support you. Don't get hung up on the term escape.

No escape wrote:

Average Joe wrote:

Guest wrote:I think AJ was musing about charging people with escape. I do not believe any of the Justices suggested charging people with escape for fleeing in a vehicle.

Was asking a serious question.

The courts have ruled that if one flees from you on foot and he knew he was going to be arrested then this person is escaping and can be charged as such. Why not the same with cars? i am not saying to do this all of the time, but if you need to keep the person in jail in order to by you time to complete your investigation than why not. They would be held with a no bond.

Just saying sometimes you need to be creative, but then I am sure you would have a very hard time finding a supervisor that would stick their neck out and sign the CRA.

No, you are confusing things. The fleeing on foot is just that... fleeing.

The justice clearly was talking about the hazards associated with automobiles in his ruling. "Risk of violence is inherent to vehicle flight," Kennedy said. "It is well known that when offenders use motor vehicles as their means of escape they create serious potential risks of physical injury to others." That is where the violent felony comes in.

You can't be creative with your charges where there is no Florida Statute to support you. Don't get hung up on the term escape.

Average Joe wrote:

Guest wrote:I think AJ was musing about charging people with escape. I do not believe any of the Justices suggested charging people with escape for fleeing in a vehicle.

Was asking a serious question.

The courts have ruled that if one flees from you on foot and he knew he was going to be arrested then this person is escaping and can be charged as such. Why not the same with cars? i am not saying to do this all of the time, but if you need to keep the person in jail in order to by you time to complete your investigation than why not. They would be held with a no bond.

Just saying sometimes you need to be creative, but then I am sure you would have a very hard time finding a supervisor that would stick their neck out and sign the CRA.

Guest wrote:I think AJ was musing about charging people with escape. I do not believe any of the Justices suggested charging people with escape for fleeing in a vehicle.