Watts To Sue LE Agencies Over DAVID Inquiries

Forum rules

LEOAFFAIRS.COM Home Page------MESSAGE BOARD ABUSE AND VIOLATIONS Page------Terms of Use------ARCADE

Post a reply


This question is a means of preventing automated form submissions by spambots.
Smilies
:D :) :( :o :shock: :? 8) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :wink: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen: :cop: :devil: :snicker: :evil:
BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: Watts To Sue LE Agencies Over DAVID Inquiries

Re: Watts To Sue LE Agencies Over DAVID Inquiries

Post by Guest » 11/30/12 10:55:19

Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:
Guest wrote: I doubt she will get the jackpot, my bet the agencies get dismissed from law suit and she will have to go after the individual officers. Then she will have to show how she was harmed, for the most part everything in DAVID is public record. Unless she can show a link from that officer looking at her information and her being harmed because of it, she is looking at zilch. Nothing here but an administration policy violation.


Guess again.


A court ruling in a different state does not have an effect in this state. She will still have to prove how it harmed her.


Wrong. Other court rulings are often recognized throughout the US.


You don't seem to get it. Each state has different laws pertaining to privacy as well as accessing those records. The laws spell out the penalties. Unless a federal court ruled on it, the ruling in her case has nothing to do with Florida. She still has to prove a harm.


The harm comes from people like you who run people for no reason against the rules and guidelines. In other words you have shown you can't be trusted with access to restricted data.


Where do you get that from? Where have you seen anything that I wrote that said I have ran people without a legal reason. I wrote about a common requirement in civil law. Your post only proves that you are an idiot. I bet you voted for Rick Scott too because he said he was running against Obama.

Re: Watts To Sue LE Agencies Over DAVID Inquiries

Post by Guest » 11/30/12 10:31:28

One easy answer. Don't apply for a DAVID Cert and if you did, let it expire. Don't use it, delete the shortcut from your desk top. Do what you need to get by and nothing more. The more you do, the better chance you will violate some law you never knew existed.

Re: Watts To Sue LE Agencies Over DAVID Inquiries

Post by Guest » 11/30/12 00:16:48

Clearwater police officer could face felony charge for misuse of law enforcement database

http://www.tampabay.com/news/publicsafety/crime/clearwater-police-officer-could-face-felony-charge-for-misuse-of-law/1263744

Re: Watts To Sue LE Agencies Over DAVID Inquiries

Post by Guest » 11/30/12 00:12:29

Guest wrote:The Florida Attorney General has confirmed that the Federal Privacy Act controls over conflicting state laws:

FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL OPINION REGARDING CONFLICTS BETWEEN STATE AND FEDERAL LAWS



Government-in-the-Sunshine Manual, volume 10, II.C.4., 1988, page 63:

"If a federal statute requires particular records to be closed and the state is clearly subject to the provisions of said statute, then pursuant to the supremacy clause of the United States Constitution, Article VI, section 2, United States Constitution, the state is required to keep such records confidential."


And then there is: FSS 815.04 Offenses against intellectual property

Re: Watts To Sue LE Agencies Over DAVID Inquiries

Post by Guest » 11/09/12 10:37:02

Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:
Guest wrote: I doubt she will get the jackpot, my bet the agencies get dismissed from law suit and she will have to go after the individual officers. Then she will have to show how she was harmed, for the most part everything in DAVID is public record. Unless she can show a link from that officer looking at her information and her being harmed because of it, she is looking at zilch. Nothing here but an administration policy violation.


Guess again.


A court ruling in a different state does not have an effect in this state. She will still have to prove how it harmed her.


Wrong. Other court rulings are often recognized throughout the US.


You don't seem to get it. Each state has different laws pertaining to privacy as well as accessing those records. The laws spell out the penalties. Unless a federal court ruled on it, the ruling in her case has nothing to do with Florida. She still has to prove a harm.


The harm comes from people like you who run people for no reason against the rules and guidelines. In other words you have shown you can't be trusted with access to restricted data.

Re: Watts To Sue LE Agencies Over DAVID Inquiries

Post by Guest » 11/09/12 10:34:54

The Florida Attorney General has confirmed that the Federal Privacy Act controls over conflicting state laws:

FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL OPINION REGARDING CONFLICTS BETWEEN STATE AND FEDERAL LAWS



Government-in-the-Sunshine Manual, volume 10, II.C.4., 1988, page 63:

"If a federal statute requires particular records to be closed and the state is clearly subject to the provisions of said statute, then pursuant to the supremacy clause of the United States Constitution, Article VI, section 2, United States Constitution, the state is required to keep such records confidential."

Re: Watts To Sue LE Agencies Over DAVID Inquiries

Post by Guest » 11/09/12 10:11:28

Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:
Guest wrote: I doubt she will get the jackpot, my bet the agencies get dismissed from law suit and she will have to go after the individual officers. Then she will have to show how she was harmed, for the most part everything in DAVID is public record. Unless she can show a link from that officer looking at her information and her being harmed because of it, she is looking at zilch. Nothing here but an administration policy violation.


Guess again.


A court ruling in a different state does not have an effect in this state. She will still have to prove how it harmed her.


Wrong. Other court rulings are often recognized throughout the US.


You don't seem to get it. Each state has different laws pertaining to privacy as well as accessing those records. The laws spell out the penalties. Unless a federal court ruled on it, the ruling in her case has nothing to do with Florida. She still has to prove a harm.

Re: Watts To Sue LE Agencies Over DAVID Inquiries

Post by Guest » 11/08/12 15:14:56

Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:
Guest wrote: I doubt she will get the jackpot, my bet the agencies get dismissed from law suit and she will have to go after the individual officers. Then she will have to show how she was harmed, for the most part everything in DAVID is public record. Unless she can show a link from that officer looking at her information and her being harmed because of it, she is looking at zilch. Nothing here but an administration policy violation.


Guess again.


A court ruling in a different state does not have an effect in this state. She will still have to prove how it harmed her.


Wrong. Other court rulings are often recognized throughout the US.

Re: Watts To Sue LE Agencies Over DAVID Inquiries

Post by Guest » 11/08/12 08:31:19

Guest wrote:
Guest wrote: I doubt she will get the jackpot, my bet the agencies get dismissed from law suit and she will have to go after the individual officers. Then she will have to show how she was harmed, for the most part everything in DAVID is public record. Unless she can show a link from that officer looking at her information and her being harmed because of it, she is looking at zilch. Nothing here but an administration policy violation.


Guess again.


A court ruling in a different state does not have an effect in this state. She will still have to prove how it harmed her.

Re: Watts To Sue LE Agencies Over DAVID Inquiries

Post by Guest » 11/07/12 23:53:27

Guest wrote: I doubt she will get the jackpot, my bet the agencies get dismissed from law suit and she will have to go after the individual officers. Then she will have to show how she was harmed, for the most part everything in DAVID is public record. Unless she can show a link from that officer looking at her information and her being harmed because of it, she is looking at zilch. Nothing here but an administration policy violation.


Guess again.

Re: Watts To Sue LE Agencies Over DAVID Inquiries

Post by $$$$$$$$$ » 11/07/12 23:51:52

A former police officer will receive more than $1 million in multiple lawsuit settlements after learning that 104 officers accessed her driver’s license picture using an official database.

The Minneapolis City Council will pay Anne Marie Rasmusson $392,000, in addition to a $280,000 settlement she reached with other cities, and $385,000 from St. Paul. More will be awarded if she wins a pending lawsuit with the state, according to the Daily Mail.

The case is one of the largest data breaches committed by officers in history, according to the article.

Rasmusson, 37, said she first became aware that other officers were looking up her photo when a colleague mentioned in 2009 that he and his partner had used their squad car computer to view her driver’s license image.

City Pages found that officers in 18 state agencies accessed her records 425 times.

Rasmusson told the paper that she feels her privacy has been violated.

“There is nothing that I would say about this driver’s license photo or any of my previous ones that in any way would deserve the attention that they’ve gotten. I can't begin to understand what people were thinking."

http://www.policeone.com/media-relations/articles/6030391-Ex-cop-awarded-1M-after-database-misused-to-find-her-photo/

Re: Watts To Sue LE Agencies Over DAVID Inquiries

Post by Guest » 08/07/12 10:34:24

I heard they were looking to suspend agency certs, meaning the National Guard will have to x65 dogs pissing on the neighbor's lawn types of calls for 30 days. Everybody who resides in a city or county that will be affected needs to hunker down for severe civil unrest. stock up on lots of food and water and bullets too.

I just got done reinforcing my hurricane shutters with lead plates and I hooked up a motion sensing sentry at my front door so I can sleep next to my back door. Aint nobody coming in to steal my dang stock pile of twinkies and ho-hos!!

Re: Watts To Sue LE Agencies Over DAVID Inquiries

Post by Guest » 08/06/12 11:01:46

Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:I'm hearing that FHP is asking FDLE to suspend certificates for 30 days for the offenders. Is this true? If so there will be some troopers spending some time at the house.


DAVID certificates or LEO certificates?



LEO certificates ie: NO Working for 30 days.



They are looking into suspending DAVID cets for 30days, not LEO certs.

Re: Watts To Sue LE Agencies Over DAVID Inquiries

Post by Guest » 08/05/12 22:00:07

That will never happen. It will probably be one or two day FHP suspensions like the locals have been doing. They know that lady is just a trouble maker.

Re: Watts To Sue LE Agencies Over DAVID Inquiries

Post by Guest » 08/05/12 21:34:38

Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:I'm hearing that FHP is asking FDLE to suspend certificates for 30 days for the offenders. Is this true? If so there will be some troopers spending some time at the house.


DAVID certificates or LEO certificates?



LEO certificates ie: NO Working for 30 days.

Top