Brodie Hughes

Forum rules

LEOAFFAIRS.COM Home Page------MESSAGE BOARD ABUSE AND VIOLATIONS Page------Terms of Use------ARCADE

Post a reply


This question is a means of preventing automated form submissions by spambots.
Smilies
:D :) :( :o :shock: :? 8) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :wink: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen: :cop: :devil: :snicker: :evil:
BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: Brodie Hughes

Re: Brodie Hughes

Post by Guest » 11/17/12 08:37:07

Sounds like there is a bit of jealousy. When he was your supervisor did he make you do your job?

Re: Brodie Hughes

Post by Guest » 11/16/12 15:41:57

A special golden child

Re: Brodie Hughes

Post by Guest » 10/30/12 15:28:23

Guesticles wrote:In all reality Hughes, or Brodie Huge as he's referred to by his coworkers, is a sad excuse for a LEO. He's only still employed because the sheriff fought to keep him. Everyone else felt he needed to go due to his continuous violation of civil rights and lack luster performance as a supervisor. What kind of excuse for an LEO orders subordinates to lie on official reports to cover his (Hughes') illegal searches?


Where is the proof that he ordered subordinates to lie? Where is the proof that he violated any civil rights? His performance as a supervisor was not lackluster. If you are trying to stir the pot go to Volusiaexposed. Your comments have no place here.

Re: Brodie Hughes

Post by Guesticles » 10/22/12 05:30:08

In all reality Hughes, or Brodie Huge as he's referred to by his coworkers, is a sad excuse for a LEO. He's only still employed because the sheriff fought to keep him. Everyone else felt he needed to go due to his continuous violation of civil rights and lack luster performance as a supervisor. What kind of excuse for an LEO orders subordinates to lie on official reports to cover his (Hughes') illegal searches?

Re: Brodie Hughes

Post by guess » 03/26/12 19:40:49

real cop wrote:
Guest wrote:Well Watson...why don't you say your agency name with pride so everybody knows. Just as a I thought.


It's probably Wackenhut.


Too busy working at a rest area to reply?? I knew you were a Wackenhut commando!

Re: Brodie Hughes

Post by real cop » 03/09/12 22:52:04

Guest wrote:Well Watson...why don't you say your agency name with pride so everybody knows. Just as a I thought.


It's probably Wackenhut.

Re: Brodie Hughes

Post by Guest » 03/09/12 08:09:19

Well Watson...why don't you say your agency name with pride so everybody knows. Just as a I thought.

Re: Brodie Hughes

Post by Guest » 03/08/12 22:00:03

Guest wrote:It does not take that much to figure out a troll on a site. Just like when folks bad mouth the Marines. Reality indicates and proves they are jealous and want to be one of the few and the proud. It is almost akin to this discussion. I would recommend you keep on applying. Sooner or later you can get tips on how to improve your chances. And maybe in the meantime take some college to bolster the GED or high school foundation. Hope this helps.



Like I said Sherlock Holmes, you got me all figured out so what's left to say. I'm able to walk anywhere in the country and say the agency I work for with pride knowing it's a worldwide name with a great rep, you can't say that and you never will. The only thing you're right about is that I am "trolling" YOU. It's entertaining and it reminds me of the teenager with the shi**y car, I guess it's something to be proud of if you can do no better. :devil:

Re: Brodie Hughes

Post by Guest » 03/08/12 21:19:06

It does not take that much to figure out a troll on a site. Just like when folks bad mouth the Marines. Reality indicates and proves they are jealous and want to be one of the few and the proud. It is almost akin to this discussion. I would recommend you keep on applying. Sooner or later you can get tips on how to improve your chances. And maybe in the meantime take some college to bolster the GED or high school foundation. Hope this helps.

Re: Brodie Hughes

Post by Guest » 03/08/12 17:46:22

Guest wrote:If this "elite" agency you are at is "all that" why do you keep coming to this site? Just as I figured...you tried to get on with the VCSO and they turned you down.


Yep you got me, I hope the Sheriff has you assigned to investigations! :snicker:

Re: Brodie Hughes

Post by Guest » 03/07/12 19:38:36

If this "elite" agency you are at is "all that" why do you keep coming to this site? Just as I figured...you tried to get on with the VCSO and they turned you down.

Re: Brodie Hughes

Post by Guest » 03/07/12 03:58:17

Guest wrote:The News Journal article stated his Lieutenant's salary was $64,000 and that his Deputy pay would be $55,000. I am a bit bewildered by the amount he is making as well. But when you qualify for an elite unit you get paid accordingly.



Actually an "elite" sgt makes $79,000, Lt's top out at $98,000. You see my friend we are elite agency and are paid accordingly you get table scraps and based on this "elite" Lt's actions it shows. Good day GED guy.

Re: Brodie Hughes

Post by Guest » 03/06/12 08:28:58

The News Journal article stated his Lieutenant's salary was $64,000 and that his Deputy pay would be $55,000. I am a bit bewildered by the amount he is making as well. But when you qualify for an elite unit you get paid accordingly.

Re: Brodie Hughes

Post by Guest » 03/05/12 11:39:24

Guest wrote:The News-Journal said he was still going to be making about %55,000.00 a year. And if he works a bit of overtime he will be doing rather well financially. Just stating the facts.


Haaaaaaaaaaaaa a VCSO DEPUTY making $55,000???? Maybe that was his LT's salary and that's even pretty low for a LT in Central Florida. The cream of the crop LT's start at 90K in Central FL.

Re: Brodie Hughes

Post by Guest » 03/05/12 09:09:03

The News-Journal said he was still going to be making about %55,000.00 a year. And if he works a bit of overtime he will be doing rather well financially. Just stating the facts.

Top