Reply to Thread

Post a reply to the thread: The Parkland shooting one year later: What's been done?

Your Message

Click here to log in

 

You may choose an icon for your message from this list

Additional Options

  • Will turn www.example.com into [URL]http://www.example.com[/URL].

Topic Review (Newest First)

  • 02-14-2019, 06:21 AM
    Unregistered
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    The "cork" case is one case. There are MANY F cases that look just like that one with various perps all over the county. Those cases disappeared into the wind as well. The schools are loaded with violent offenders. THAT's gonna be exposed.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bk09...youtu.be&t=123
  • 02-14-2019, 04:04 AM
    Unregistered
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    The "cork" case is one case. There are MANY F cases that look just like that one with various perps all over the county. Those cases disappeared into the wind as well. The schools are loaded with violent offenders. THAT's gonna be exposed.
    Well we were told to use CC with discretion until we were told that that discretion was now MANDATORY days after enacting the PROMISE program in Nov. of 2013. Good thing there's a transcript of Israel telling the kiddos that he tied his own deputies' hands behind our backs, basically encouraging the little criminals to freely break the law without fear of repercussions.
  • 02-14-2019, 01:38 AM
    Unregistered
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    What felony? Unless you're referring to Brett Israel's.
    There were no felonies for 18-1958.

    Runcie needs to have a few of those golden tickets filled out with all the "misdemeanors" 18-1958 committed as a 17 year old (or under).

    Or is that why your "discretionary" is in quotation marks.
    The "cork" case is one case. There are MANY F cases that look just like that one with various perps all over the county. Those cases disappeared into the wind as well. The schools are loaded with violent offenders. THAT's gonna be exposed.
  • 02-14-2019, 01:09 AM
    Unregistered
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    this does not apply for a felony. Those are the cases that are in question. It's the "discretionary" determination that will be in microscopic focus.
    What felony? Unless you're referring to Brett Israel's.
    There were no felonies for 18-1958.

    Runcie needs to have a few of those golden tickets filled out with all the "misdemeanors" 18-1958 committed as a 17 year old (or under).

    Or is that why your "discretionary" is in quotation marks.
  • 02-13-2019, 10:13 PM
    Unregistered
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    Only if runcie has this golden ticket=

    https://www.browardschools.com/cms/l...obationary.pdf
    this does not apply for a felony. Those are the cases that are in question. It's the "discretionary" determination that will be in microscopic focus.
  • 02-13-2019, 09:33 PM
    Unregistered
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    Runcie is gearing up to blame BSO by citing that Step #2 of the discipline matrix puts all responsibility on the deputy and the respective district- and will deny that the SRD's were not informed of crimes. If you read it; technically it does. He's going to try to nail Israel to save himself. It's bound to get some people into a mess before they both destroy each other in the news. Plus the "chef" and his wife are reconsidering their position. They know it's "out"
    Only if runcie has this golden ticket=

    https://www.browardschools.com/cms/l...obationary.pdf
  • 02-13-2019, 09:05 PM
    Unregistered

    Uh-oh!!!!

    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    Runcie is gearing up to blame BSO by citing that Step #2 of the discipline matrix puts all responsibility on the deputy and the respective district- and will deny that the SRD's were not informed of crimes. If you read it; technically it does. He's going to try to nail Israel to save himself. It's bound to get some people into a mess before they both destroy each other in the news. Plus the "chef" and his wife are reconsidering their position. They know it's "out"

    https://www.trbas.com/media/media/ac...0-13112334.pdf
  • 02-13-2019, 09:00 PM
    Unregistered
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    Runcie is gearing up to blame BSO by citing that Step #2 of the discipline matrix puts all responsibility on the deputy and the respective district- and will deny that the SRD's were not informed of crimes. If you read it; technically it does. He's going to try to nail Israel to save himself. It's bound to get some people into a mess before they both destroy each other in the news. Plus the "chef" and his wife are reconsidering their position. They know it's "out"
    O-well, you know what they say, what's osgood for the goose is osgood for the gander.
  • 02-13-2019, 06:57 PM
    Unregistered
    Runcie is gearing up to blame BSO by citing that Step #2 of the discipline matrix puts all responsibility on the deputy and the respective district- and will deny that the SRD's were not informed of crimes. If you read it; technically it does. He's going to try to nail Israel to save himself. It's bound to get some people into a mess before they both destroy each other in the news. Plus the "chef" and his wife are reconsidering their position. They know it's "out"
  • 02-13-2019, 06:15 PM
    Unregistered

    10-4 will do on 2-14

    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    Go Away !!!!
    https://www.politico.com/newsletters...ections-392269

    INVESTIGATION — A blockbuster Sun-Sentinel story on Tuesday exposed how Runcie and a majority of the school board wanted to protect bureaucratic turf by lobbying against a 2013 state legislative plan aimed at getting more security money. It was proposed after the slaughter of 26 children and adults at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Connecticut. The school board members and Runcie said the legislation wasn’t needed. And they touted their own security plans. But not enough happened. Then 17 were killed, and 17 more were wounded by a gunman at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School. And then a state investigation found deficiencies in those very school security measures that Broward had promised in 2013 and that might have saved lives 364 days ago.

    2013? Hmmm
This thread has more than 10 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •