PDA

View Full Version : Alberto Troche sues Officer Peter Delio & OPD



03-24-2014, 04:56 PM
Alberto Troche sued Officer Peter Delio and the city of Orlando in federal court, accusing the officer of violating his civil rights by seizing his iPhone while he was video-recording police as they arrested a loud, screaming man outside a downtown bar.

It alleges that Troche's first, fourth and 14th amendment rights were violated, in addition to being a victim of false arrest and false imprisonment.

According to the suit, Troche was walking to his car Dec. 7 about 2:30 a.m. when he saw a crowd, including several police officers, and heard a man calling for help.

The man was on the ground, and officers were arresting him, a video shows. Several bystanders were recording the confrontation on cell phones, including Troche, and officers ordered them to stop and to surrender the devices.

The video he shot shows an officer walking up and pulling it from his hand.

Troche was handcuffed and jailed for 15 hours, accused of resisting arrest without violence.

The State Attorney's Office elected not to file charges, and the police department returned his phone.

In the arrest report, Delio wrote that before he seized Troche's phone, he told him that it contained evidence of a crime and that he needed it.

Delio also wrote that he did not take the phone until he had placed Troche in the back of a squad car.

J. Marc Jones, the Oviedo lawyer who filed suit, called the seizure a blatant violation of Troche's rights. "People should not spent 15 hours in jail for recording police activity."

Full article:
http://articles.orlandosentinel.com/201 ... lse-arrest (http://articles.orlandosentinel.com/2014-03-17/news/os-orlando-police-officer-seize-video-phone-20140317_1_officer-peter-delio-orlando-police-officer-false-arrest)

Baltimore PD rewrites general order to make it clear that citizen's may record police:
http://cbsbaltimore.files.wordpress.com ... 42_001.pdf (http://cbsbaltimore.files.wordpress.com/2014/03/0142_001.pdf)

03-31-2014, 06:46 PM
maybe he'll think twice before being somewhere he shouldn't be and recording police activity without permission. I'm just saying,,.,

04-16-2014, 02:53 PM
maybe he'll think twice before being somewhere he shouldn't be and recording police activity without permission. I'm just saying,,.,

Recording police activity is not a crime. If anything Officers could have gotten videographers name and contact information for possible subpoena purposes.
Once we leave our front doors any reasonable expectations of privacy is out the window. Do your job and do it well and let the rest play itself out.

04-16-2014, 06:55 PM
maybe he'll think twice before being somewhere he shouldn't be and recording police activity without permission. I'm just saying,,.,

Recording police activity is not a crime. If anything Officers could have gotten videographers name and contact information for possible subpoena purposes....and enough time to delete it????.

Unregistered
04-24-2015, 04:07 AM
maybe he'll think twice before being somewhere he shouldn't be and recording police activity without permission. I'm just saying,,.,

Wrong! Since this incident this man won a law suit against OPD and the officer. Since this event .. this officer has now been charged with a felony .. and got a chance to feel what it's like to sit in a holding cell. Probably the sickest part od all .. the officer (even though he has been charged with a felony) is still off duty (with pay). So much for the Chief of Police letting this bad seed go .... obviously this man is a danger to the public and should never wear a uniform ever again.